Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
st: grouping, negative binomial regression, and margins
From
Ahmed Al Attar <[email protected]>
To
[email protected]
Subject
st: grouping, negative binomial regression, and margins
Date
Sat, 10 Aug 2013 23:04:56 +0100
Hi,
I am working on a project where I have a bivariate model. All of my data are counts and I have verified using countfit that the best model to use is the Negative binomial regression.
My Dependent Variable is called NUMTA (with values one of 0,1,2,3,4,5,6)
My Independent Variable is called NUMDS (with values either 0, 1 or 2)
The study takes place over 10 different regions, each with counts of NUMTA and NUMDS which brings us to a total of 870 observations.
The commands that I have entered into stata are:
sort region
by region: nbreg NUMTA i.NUMDS, nolog
The output is a negative binomial regression by region as you can see below. This is for 1 of my 10 regions:
Negative binomial regression Number of obs = 87
LR chi2(1) = 0.50
Dispersion = mean Prob > chi2 = 0.4810
Log likelihood = -34.128129 Pseudo R2 = 0.0072
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
numta | Coef. Std. Err. z P>|z| [95% Conf. Interval]
-------------+----------------------------------------------------------------
1.numds | -12.98646 1298.721 -0.01 0.992 -2558.434 2532.461
_cons | -2.044954 .3103769 -6.59 0.000 -2.653282 -1.436627
-------------+----------------------------------------------------------------
/lnalpha | -.7772627 3.388113 -7.417842 5.863317
-------------+----------------------------------------------------------------
alpha | .4596625 1.557389 .0006004 351.8895
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Likelihood-ratio test of alpha=0: chibar2(01) = 0.11 Prob>=chibar2 = 0.367
However, when I follow this up with the command:
margins NUMDS
then I get the following output:
Adjusted predictions Number of obs = 87
Model VCE : OIM
Expression : Predicted number of events, predict()
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Delta-method
| Margin Std. Err. z P>|z| [95% Conf. Interval]
-------------+----------------------------------------------------------------
numds |
0 | .0657895 .0310757 2.12 0.034 .0048822 .1266967
1 | .1111111 .1214722 0.91 0.360 -.1269701 .3491923
2 | .4999992 .6852692 0.73 0.466 -.8431037 1.843102
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The above output says 87 observations, when I know it should show predictions for 870 observations instead. Which leads me to believe that it has done the margins command for only 1 of my 10 regions.
Is there a way to do the margins command using (by region:) in order to get 10 different margins outputs? When I try to run the command by region: margins NUMDS state says I cannot run it. If not, is there any other course of action you would advise?
Thank you very much for your support,
Ahmed Al-Attar
RCTC-Organization
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/