Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: st: RE: Cox regression for grouped survival data
From
Steve Samuels <[email protected]>
To
[email protected]
Subject
Re: st: RE: Cox regression for grouped survival data
Date
Thu, 8 Aug 2013 20:40:38 -0400
Enzo, you can be as semi-parametric as you'd like with -cloglog-. With
enough data you can fit a separate integrated baseline hazard to each
interval.
But a parsimonious approach is to fit a flexible polynomial to the
period terms, perhaps a fractional polynomial (-fp-). In a similar
spirit, the packages -stpm- (Royston) and -stpm2- (Lambert) at SSC fit
restricted cubic splines to the survival function.
The shortcomings of the the standard Kaplan-Meier and Breslow estimates
(Breslow, 1972) were presented by Lambert and Royston at the 2009 UK
Stata meetings. Cox himself preferred a parametric approach (Reid, 1994,
p. 450), as did Efron (1988).
References:
Breslow, NE. 1972. Contribution to the discussion of the paper by DR
Cox. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B 34, no. 2:
216-217.
Efron, Bradley. 1988. Logistic Regression, Survival Analysis, and the
Kaplan-Meier Curve. Journal of the American Statistical Association
Journal of the American Statistical Association 83, no. 402: 414-425.
Lambert, P. C., & Royston, P. (2009). Flexible parametric alternatives
to the Cox model. UK Stata User Group.
http://www.stata.com/meeting/uk09/uk09_lambert_royston.pdf
Reid, Nancy. 1994. A conversation with Sir David Cox. Statistical
Science 9, no. 3: 439-455.
Steve
> On Aug 8, 2013, at 11:11 AM, [email protected] wrote:
>
> Hi Pradip,
>
> thanks for further reference.
>
> I believe that the approach suggested by Steve may be applied to this
> situation (the work of prof. Jenkins in this field is precious), but in
> strict sense it is a parametric approach.
>
> The approach followed by Feuer and al. should be semiparametric, that
> is a Cox-like model.
>
> Enzo
>
> ----Messaggio originale----
>
> Da: [email protected]
>
> Data: 8-ago-2013 15.23
>
> A: "[email protected]"<[email protected]>
>
> Ogg: st: RE: Cox regression for grouped survival data
>
> Hello,
>
> The following article has also used Cox regression for grouped survival
> analysis of the NHIS-Linked Mortality Public Use Data Files.
>
> "21st-Century Hazards of Smoking and Benefits of Cessation in the
> United Stateshttp://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMsa1211128#t=articleMethods
>
> Recently, Steve Samuels (StataList) has suggested to me that I use
> complementary log log models (-cloglog-) for my analysis of the same
> data (mentioned above) but for a different topic.
>
> The following is from Steve, " see the Lesson 6 link to discrete data
> analysis on Stephen Jenkins's fine web page "Survival analysis with
> Stata""
>
> (http://www.iser.essex.ac.uk/survival-analysis).
> --
> From: [email protected] [mailto:owner-
> [email protected]] On Behalf Of [email protected]
>
> Sent: Thursday, August 08, 2013 3:26 AM
>
> To: [email protected]
>
> Subject: st: Cox regression for grouped survival data
>
> Dear Stata Users,
>
> recently,for developping the Cancer Surveillance Query System, Feuer
> and coll. of the NCI used a Cox Regression for Grouped survival data
> (Cancer. 2012 Nov 15;118(22):5652-62. doi: 10.1002/cncr.27615. Epub
> 2012 May 8).
>
> Cox model can be sensitive to tied survival times and often we know
> only the number of events occurring within time intervals.
>
> Often we can read that Cox model is really suitable for data where time
> is continuous.
>
> I would ask further addresses on this topic and mainly if exists a
>
> Stata command-resource to fit a Cox regression for grouped survival
>
> data.
>
> Many thanks.
>
> Enzo
>
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/