Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
st: Meta-epidemiological analysis (RORs)
From
Spyros Papageorgiou <[email protected]>
To
[email protected]
Subject
st: Meta-epidemiological analysis (RORs)
Date
Tue, 6 Aug 2013 10:43:50 +0200
Dear All,
I would appreciate any comment on the following:
I want to calculate ratios of odds ratios (ROR) for my meta-analyses
cohort with random-effects meta-regression as proposed by Sterne et al
(2002) in Statist Med. I am using Stata 10.0 for Windows.
I think I ‘ve worked it out relative good with the metareg command
(with K-H modification) and tried to compare the output by the results
of manually calculating fixed the RORs, but I am not 100% sure.
I am having two kinds of binary only data (some meta-analyses give the
first, some the second): (i) raw 2x2 data and (ii) calculated ORs.
(i) For the raw data I use:
metan exn exsample ctn ctsample, or log random by(design) nograph
metareg _ES design, wsse(_seES)
with „exn, exsample, ctn, ctsample“ being the events and sample fort
he two groups, „design“ being the trial characteristic I assess and
_ES, _seES being the automatic Stata inputs for effect size and
standard error
(ii) For the calculated ORs I use:
metareg logor design, wsse(selogor)
with the log odds ratios and their standard errors respectively.
I then get the logRORs and their selogROR that are given in the
metareg output from all meta-analyses and pool them using.
metan logror selogror,random eform rfdist to get the pooled RORs with
their 95% CIs and 95% PIs in the forest plot.
Do you think this approach is ok?
Thanks in advance
Spyros
[email protected]
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/