Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
st: nlogit for single observation data using STATA 12
From
"Vahidnia, Farnaz" <[email protected]>
To
"'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>
Subject
st: nlogit for single observation data using STATA 12
Date
Mon, 5 Aug 2013 21:34:38 +0000
Hello,
I am trying to fit a nested logit model to estimate OR of being an HIV case by gender for certain risk factors. I don't want to stratify be gender because most independent variables are shared between male and female, and I want to stratify only on variables related to sexual risk behavior. I only have one observation per subject and am using STATA 12.
The gender specific independent var in my data is sexual orientation (sexorientlife) with three levels: 1=Heterosexual, 2=homosexual and 3=bisexual
I created the tree structure using:
nlogitgen gender=male (male:1, female: 0)
nlogitgen sexorient=sexorientlife (hetero: 1, homo: 2 3)
My tree structure looks like this:
tree structure specified for the nested logit model
gender N sexorient N k
------------------------------------
male 1238 --- hetero 1120 439
+- homo 118 105
female 1202 --- hetero 1098 368
+- homo 104 60
------------------------------------
total 2440 972
My dependent var is "hivcase", binary, 0 for controls 1 for cases.
The model look like:
. nlogit hivcase ageyear lowincome black multiplepartner || gender: || sexorient:, case(study_number) noconstant
note: 1485 cases dropped because they have only one alternative
no cases remain after removing invalid observations
I guess the problem is that "nlogit requires only that hierarchy be maintained for all cases." Which is not true in my data, as a subject does not have a choice to multiple sexual orientations.
In other words my choices are mutually exclusive.
Another problem I guess is that IIA is a property is violated as the odds of choosing one alternative over another (sexual orientation) is not independent of the other alternatives.
I am thinking about considering gender as a group option, to make data look like 2 subjects with ~ 1200 observations per subject.
I appreciate any help or comment.
Thanks,
Farnaz
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/