Bookmark and Share

Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

st: Nearmrg deleting unmerged observations


From   Lara Loewenstein <[email protected]>
To   statalist <[email protected]>
Subject   st: Nearmrg deleting unmerged observations
Date   Fri, 12 Jul 2013 16:19:46 -0400

data is clean, so there shouldn't be many mismatches because of
different street names. The problem is that there is almost a 20 year
difference from when the using data and the master data were created.
My concern that street numbers could have been eliminated or changed,
and I wanted to look at the nearmrg results just to see if there were
a lot of inexact, yet close matches. Do you know how time invariant or
variant geocoding is?

Eric: Thanks, that will work. I was hoping to avoid doing that, but it
definitely solves the problem.
*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/


© Copyright 1996–2018 StataCorp LLC   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index