Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: st: ologit, gologit2, mlogit?
From
Richard Williams <[email protected]>
To
[email protected], [email protected]
Subject
Re: st: ologit, gologit2, mlogit?
Date
Mon, 08 Jul 2013 12:56:36 -0500
mlogit may be your best bet (although there are a few other choices,
such as slogit). But, just from what you say, I wonder if your model
is too complicated and/or you are spreading your data too thin. You
might consider combining categories of the ordinal variable (at least
if some have very small frequencies), or using fewer variables, or
(if using autofit with gologit2) use the .01 level of significance.
gologit2 troubleshooting tips are at
http://www3.nd.edu/~rwilliam/gologit2/tsfaq.html
You might also want to assess how substantively important the
violations are -- you give up a lot of parsimony when you switch from
ologit to mlogit, and it may not be worth it if the violations are
substantively trivial. You might consider using BIC tests as an
alternative criterion for rejecting the proportional odds model, e.g.
do something like
gologit2 y x1 x2 x3, pl sto(ologit)
gologit2 y x1 x2 x3, npl sto(gologit)
lrtest ologit gologit, stats
The likelihood ratio test is similar to the Brant test. But, you'll
also get BIC stats reported, and it is possible that the BICs might
favor the ologit model even if the LR test says to reject it.
At 03:57 AM 7/8/2013, John Antonakis wrote:
Hi:
I have model, having a dependent variable with 5 categories that are
ordered. The model violates the assumptions of the -brant- test
(after ologit estimation). It also produces predicted probabilities
of less than zero in the user-written command (from SSC) -gologit2-
(generalized ordered logit); in addition, I can only estimate a
partial model because I can't estimate the full model with some dummy controls.
I think that the only option I have available is to estimate a
-mlogit- model, which makes no assumptions on the ordering or on the
proporational odds assumption (brant).
Does anyone know of any literature to support my intuition on this point?
Or are there any other ways to estimate this model with Stata?
Thanks!
John.
--
__________________________________________
John Antonakis
Professor of Organizational Behavior
Director, Ph.D. Program in Management
Faculty of Business and Economics
University of Lausanne
Internef #618
CH-1015 Lausanne-Dorigny
Switzerland
Tel ++41 (0)21 692-3438
Fax ++41 (0)21 692-3305
http://www.hec.unil.ch/people/jantonakis
Associate Editor
The Leadership Quarterly
__________________________________________
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
-------------------------------------------
Richard Williams, Notre Dame Dept of Sociology
OFFICE: (574)631-6668, (574)631-6463
HOME: (574)289-5227
EMAIL: [email protected]
WWW: http://www.nd.edu/~rwilliam
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/