Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
st: fixed-effects regression – link test?
From
Gwinyai Masukume <[email protected]>
To
statalist <[email protected]>
Subject
st: fixed-effects regression – link test?
Date
Tue, 2 Jul 2013 15:15:19 +0200
Dear Stata listers,
Hi.
I’m using Stata version 12.1.
I’m running a fixed-effects regression model and the output is below:
I’m not sure if the output suggests that the fixed-effects regression
model is appropriate and/or if significant predictors were omitted
from the model?
What goodness of fit test would be appropriate for this model?
-----------------------------
linktest, group(PAIR)
Iteration 0: log likelihood = -30.729721
Iteration 1: log likelihood = -30.672171
Iteration 2: log likelihood = -30.672033
Iteration 3: log likelihood = -30.672033
Conditional (fixed-effects) logistic regression Number of obs = 112
LR chi2(2) = 16.29
Prob > chi2 = 0.0003
Log likelihood = -30.672033 Pseudo R2 = 0.2098
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
LOW | Coef. Std. Err. z P>|z| [95% Conf. Interval]
-------------+----------------------------------------------------------------
_hat | .9628932 .538899 1.79 0.074 -.0933294 2.019116
_hatsq | -.0226049 .2737776 -0.08 0.934 -.5591992 .5139894
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Kind regards,
Gwinyai
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/