Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: st: Re: coefficient explanation
From
Kayla Bridge <[email protected]>
To
"[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject
RE: st: Re: coefficient explanation
Date
Sun, 16 Jun 2013 06:07:36 +0000
Thank you, Joseph.
Best,
Kayla
----------------------------------------
> From: [email protected]
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: st: Re: coefficient explanation
> Date: Sun, 16 Jun 2013 12:17:12 +0900
>
> Kayla Bridge wrote:
>
> Thanks a lot, Joseph and John.
>
> But I searched the previous emails, I did not find the post by Maarten Buis.
> Could you please send me the post? I appreciate.
>
> ----------------------------------------
>
> Well, you could start here (
> http://www.stata.com/statalist/archive/2013-03/msg00305.html ) for a recent
> thread, and here ( http://www.stata.com/statalist/archive/2006-07/msg00584.html
> ) for an older one.
>
> But threads concerning endogeneity, omitted variables, mediation and so on pop
> up on this list every now and then, and the threads have many participants. I
> wasn't intending to neglect contributions from other list members.
>
> John Antonakis posted on this thread after I did, and I thought that the
> references he cited in his post (including the podcast lecture) covered your
> questions well.
>
> Joseph Coveney
>
> *
> * For searches and help try:
> * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
> * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
> * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/