Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
st: Postestimation after asclogit
From
Simon <[email protected]>
To
[email protected]
Subject
st: Postestimation after asclogit
Date
Wed, 05 Jun 2013 13:43:04 +0200
Dear Statalist,
I have a problem related to postestimation after -asclogit-
Using Stata 11, I am estimating an conditional logit model using
-asclogit- with 11 alternative specific variables. The regression runs
well and the output is expected. So far so good.
Following the example of Cameron and Trivedi (see ref below), I compute
predicted probabilities with -predict pasclogit, pr- to compare the
sample averaged predicted probabilities to the sample probabilities
(observed proportions of each alternative), which gives an indicating of
the precision of the estimated model. However, it seems that I am unable
to get standard deviations regarding the predicted probabilities of the
alternatives. Can anyone think of what may be wrong?
I also have some trouble in computing marginal effects for my variable
of interest (g), using -estat mfx, varlist(g)-
asclogit y g $x, case(id) casevars() alt(alternatives) basealt()
vce(robust) nocons nolog or
predict pasclogit, pr
table alternatives, contents(mean y mean pasclogit sd pasclogit)
estat mfx, varlist(g)
Table of probabilities,
Alternative mean(Y) mean(pasclogit) sd(pasclogit)
1 .35 .3597599 0
2 .0037234 .0108259 0
3 .0141844 .0126832 0
4 .0512411 .0398555 0
5 .0074468 .0042902 0
6 .0210993 .0220582 0
...
Reference: Cameron & Trivedi (2009) Microeconometrics using Stata,
chapter 15.5.7
Thanks in advance,
Simon
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/