Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
st: Comparison of logistic regressions with different outcomes
From
Zachary Neal <[email protected]>
To
[email protected]
Subject
st: Comparison of logistic regressions with different outcomes
Date
Tue, 4 Jun 2013 16:44:22 -0400
I am looking for a way to compare two logistic regression models
estimated on the same data, with the same predictors, but with
different outcomes. In essence, I want to know whether a given set of
predictors is better at predicting outcome A or outcome B.
I found this site useful for understanding the pseudo-R2 statistics
reported by the fitstat command:
http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/mult_pkg/faq/general/Psuedo_RSquareds.htm
As I understand it, for all their faults, the same pseudo-R2 can
validly be compared across two models estimated on the same data, with
the same outcome, but with different predictors. But, my case is the
opposite of this: the predictors remain the same across models, but
the outcomes change.
Any suggestions would be appreciated.
--
Zachary Neal, PhD
Department of Sociology
Michigan State University
[email protected]
http://www.msu.edu/~zpneal
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/