Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
From | "Roger B. Newson" <r.newson@imperial.ac.uk> |
To | statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu |
Subject | Re: st: Use of Stata now fastest growing |
Date | Fri, 17 May 2013 11:19:34 +0100 |
Best wishes Roger ReferencesNewson R. Efficient calculation of jackknife confidence intervals for rank statistics. Journal of Statistical Software 2006; 15(1): 1-10.
Roger B Newson BSc MSc DPhil Lecturer in Medical Statistics Respiratory Epidemiology and Public Health Group National Heart and Lung Institute Imperial College London Royal Brompton Campus Room 33, Emmanuel Kaye Building 1B Manresa Road London SW3 6LR UNITED KINGDOM Tel: +44 (0)20 7352 8121 ext 3381 Fax: +44 (0)20 7351 8322 Email: r.newson@imperial.ac.uk Web page: http://www.imperial.ac.uk/nhli/r.newson/ Departmental Web page: http://www1.imperial.ac.uk/medicine/about/divisions/nhli/respiration/popgenetics/reph/ Opinions expressed are those of the author, not of the institution. On 17/05/2013 04:10, Stas Kolenikov wrote:
Don't forget that there was a good deal of uncertainty about what's going with SPSS when IBM bought it (was it 2008? 2009?), and it was renamed PASW at some point, etc. Do citations of the Stata Journal show a similar pattern? Not sure if other packages have their dedicated journals, although you one can arguably view Journal of Statistical Software as the mostly R outlet. -- Stas Kolenikov, PhD, PStat (SSC) -- Senior Survey Statistician, Abt SRBI -- Opinions stated in this email are mine only, and do not reflect the position of my employer -- http://stas.kolenikov.name On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 6:51 PM, JVerkuilen (Gmail) <jvverkuilen@gmail.com> wrote:On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 2:40 PM, Muenchen, Robert A (Bob) <muenchen@utk.edu> wrote:I replied to Roland on my blog, but it's a very intriguing question so here's my response for Statalist readers. Is anyone aware of a change, perhaps in the APA Publication Manual, suggesting that people stop citing software around 2005? Or perhaps a year or two earlier given the publication lag?>Yeah massive shifts like that are... odd. One big pressure may well be that SPSS over that time period instituted progressively more restrictive licensing, which lead many universities to drop it or restrict its usage short of dropping it. I suspect that there's no "killer" explanation, though. * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/ * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/* * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/ * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
* * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/ * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/