Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: st: digits difference between stata and mata
From
Nick Cox <[email protected]>
To
"[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject
Re: st: digits difference between stata and mata
Date
Tue, 14 May 2013 00:24:08 +0100
I don't know what you understand here by "like regression" but formats
assigned by -format- are by definition display formats and have no
effect on what is stored and therefore no effect on the results of
calculation.
Among other arguments, numeric formats controlling the number of
decimal places shown in displays have no bearing on the binary
representation of numbers.
There are many discussions, including
http://www.stata-journal.com/article.html?article=dm0067
Nick
[email protected]
On 13 May 2013 22:11, Wu Zhang <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Thanks!
>
> By the way, does the format change the calculation results, like regression?
>
> ________________________________
> From: Nick Cox <[email protected]>
>
> Please note: "Stata", "Mata", as at
>
> http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/#spell
>
> What you see is is likely just to be a side-effect of different
> default formats. You can arrange the same format. Look at -help
> format-.
>
> . sysuse auto
> (1978 Automobile Data)
>
> . gen gpm = 1/mpg
>
> . list gpm in 1/10
>
> +----------+
> | gpm |
> |----------|
> 1. | .0454545 |
> 2. | .0588235 |
> 3. | .0454545 |
> 4. | .05 |
> 5. | .0666667 |
> |----------|
> 6. | .0555556 |
> 7. | .0384615 |
> 8. | .05 |
> 9. | .0625 |
> 10. | .0526316 |
> +----------+
>
> . mata
> ------------------------------------------------- mata (type end to
> exit) ---------------
>
> : gpm2 = st_data(., "gpm")
>
> : gpm2[(1..10)]
> 1
> +---------------+
> 1 | .0454545468 |
> 2 | .0588235296 |
> 3 | .0454545468 |
> 4 | .0500000007 |
> 5 | .0666666701 |
> 6 | .055555556 |
> 7 | .0384615399 |
> 8 | .0500000007 |
> 9 | .0625 |
> 10 | .0526315793 |
> +---------------+
>
> : strofreal(gpm2[(1..10)], "%5.4f")
> 1
> +----------+
> 1 | 0.0455 |
> 2 | 0.0588 |
> 3 | 0.0455 |
> 4 | 0.0500 |
> 5 | 0.0667 |
> 6 | 0.0556 |
> 7 | 0.0385 |
> 8 | 0.0500 |
> 9 | 0.0625 |
> 10 | 0.0526 |
> +----------+
>
> : end
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> . format gpm %5.4f
>
> . list gpm in 1/10
>
> +--------+
> | gpm |
> |--------|
> 1. | 0.0455 |
> 2. | 0.0588 |
> 3. | 0.0455 |
> 4. | 0.0500 |
> 5. | 0.0667 |
> |--------|
> 6. | 0.0556 |
> 7. | 0.0385 |
> 8. | 0.0500 |
> 9. | 0.0625 |
> 10. | 0.0526 |
> +--------+
>
> Nick
> [email protected]
>
>
> On 13 May 2013 07:50, Wu Zhang <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> I have a variable list which has different digits after being imported into MATA; I take a snap of the whole picture:
>>
>> In stata:
>>
>> --------------------------------------------
>> 1. 9.477003 8.210668 59.375 -2.00877
>> 2. 9.34036 9.473704 66.0647 -1.543392
>> 3. 8.986102 8.188967 53.92946 -.5894488
>> 4. 9.285332 9.773379 73.92938 -.2278635
>> 5. 9.286468 9.812742 57.82097 -.0813199
>>
>>
>>
>> While in MATA:
>> 1 9.477003098 8.21066761 59.375 -2.008770227
>> 2 9.340359688 9.473704338 66.0647049 -1.54339242
>> 3 8.986102104 8.188966751 53.92946243 -.5894488096
>> 4 9.285331726 9.773379326 73.92938232 -.2278635055
>> 5 9.286467552 9.812742233 57.82096863 -.0813199058
>>
>>
>> Note that what we see in STATA is the same as in the data editor view.
>>
>>
>> I am just wondering whether there is a way to make them the same?
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/