Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: st: logit average "marginal" effect of dummy variable with predict
From
Chris <[email protected]>
To
[email protected]
Subject
Re: st: logit average "marginal" effect of dummy variable with predict
Date
Tue, 7 May 2013 14:58:57 +0200
Hi Richard,
thanks, everything works out. Didn't know that a dummy has to be
defined as such.
On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 2:32 PM, Richard Williams
<[email protected]> wrote:
> You are treating smoke as a continuous variable rather than as discrete.
> Instead do
>
> logit low lwt ptd i.smoke age
>
> margins, dydx(smoke) //AME of smoke
>
> The latter produces
>
> Average marginal effects Number of obs =
> 112
> Model VCE : OIM
>
> Expression : Pr(low), predict()
> dy/dx w.r.t. : 1.smoke
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> | Delta-method
> | dy/dx Std. Err. z P>|z| [95% Conf.
> Interval]
> -------------+----------------------------------------------------------------
> 1.smoke | .229702 .0923031 2.49 0.013 .0487913
> .4106127
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Note: dy/dx for factor levels is the discrete change from the base level.
>
>
> Incidentally, I like this alternate syntax, mostly because of the way output
> gets labeled, especially in graphs:
>
> margins r.smoke
>
>
> At 07:48 AM 5/7/2013, Chris wrote:
>>
>> Dear statalist,
>>
>> I want to compute the average marginal effect of an interaction
>> effect, so I have to simultaneously "switch on and off" two treatment
>> dummies (one treatment dummy, and one subgroup dummy interacted with
>> the treatment dummy). Margins can't do that, as Richard Williams
>> recently pointed out here on statalist.
>> (http://www.stata.com/statalist/archive/2013-01/msg00263.html)
>>
>> So I am trying to compute it manually. However, I don't even manage to
>> compute the average marginal effect with the predict command; somehow,
>> there is a discrepancy between margins and predict even for simple
>> cases. Does anybody know why? Example:
>>
>> -------------------------------
>> webuse lowbirth, clear
>> logit low lwt ptd smoke age
>> margins, dydx(smoke) //AME of smoke
>>
>> replace smoke=1 //set entire sample smoke=1
>> predict withsmoke //predict probability
>> replace smoke=0 //set entire sample smoke=0
>> predict withoutsmoke //predict probability
>> gen me=withsmoke-withoutsmoke //compute discrete "marginal" effect
>> egen ame=mean(me) //AME of smoke
>> -------------------------------
>>
>> The margins command gives an AME of .2198375, while the predict
>> version gives .2297. Which is right and why do they differ?
>>
>> Thanks!
>> *
>> * For searches and help try:
>> * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
>> * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
>> * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
>
>
> -------------------------------------------
> Richard Williams, Notre Dame Dept of Sociology
> OFFICE: (574)631-6668, (574)631-6463
> HOME: (574)289-5227
> EMAIL: [email protected]
> WWW: http://www.nd.edu/~rwilliam
>
>
> *
> * For searches and help try:
> * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
> * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
> * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/