Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
st: Testing the significance in the change in dummy variable coefficients over different years
From
Scott Wright <[email protected]>
To
"[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject
st: Testing the significance in the change in dummy variable coefficients over different years
Date
Wed, 1 May 2013 15:46:39 +0000
I am using -xtreg, fe- in Stata to estimate a basic model of how the number of people claiming jobseekers allowance in former UK coalfield areas has changed year on year. The model used is as follows:
xtreg totalclaimant y2005xshcoalfield2003 y2006xshcoalfield2003 y2007xshcoalfield2003 y2008xshcoalfield2003 y2009xshcoalfield2003 y2010xshcoalfield2003 y2011xshcoalfield2003 y2005 y2006 y2007 y2008 y2009 y2010 y2011, fe
(I have data from years 2004-2011, so 2004 is the base year)
This returns the following results:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
totalclaimantrate | Coef. Std. Err. t P>|t| [95% Conf. Interval]
----------------------+----------------------------------------------------------------
y2005xshcoalfield2003 | .1086935 .0654097 1.66 0.097 -.0195712 .2369582
y2006xshcoalfield2003 | .1139901 .0654097 1.74 0.082 -.0142747 .2422548
y2007xshcoalfield2003 | .1262875 .0654097 1.93 0.054 -.0019773 .2545522
y2008xshcoalfield2003 | .4903476 .0654097 7.50 0.000 .3620829 .6186124
y2009xshcoalfield2003 | .5707653 .0654097 8.73 0.000 .4425006 .6990301
y2010xshcoalfield2003 | .4130544 .0654097 6.31 0.000 .2847897 .5413191
y2011xshcoalfield2003 | .5392505 .0650208 8.29 0.000 .4117483 .6667527
y2005 | .183771 .0280191 6.56 0.000 .1288271 .2387149
y2006 | .2514903 .0280191 8.98 0.000 .1965464 .3064342
y2007 | -.0576325 .0280191 -2.06 0.040 -.1125764 -.0026886
y2008 | .7497359 .0280191 26.76 0.000 .694792 .8046798
y2009 | 1.648683 .0280191 58.84 0.000 1.593739 1.703627
y2010 | 1.241315 .0280191 44.30 0.000 1.186371 1.296259
y2011 | 1.489159 .0279894 53.20 0.000 1.434273 1.544044
_cons | 1.741667 .0179562 97.00 0.000 1.706456 1.776878
As you can see, there is obviously a significant difference in coefficients on y2005xshcoalfield through to y2007xshcoalfield and y2008xshcoalfield through to y2011xshcoalfield but is there any way of formally testing whether the difference is significant or not? An obvious way of doing this would be to do differences in differences, but since I am having to use fixed effects estimation I wouldn't know how to do this.
Many thanks,
Scott
This message and any attachment are intended solely for the addressee and may contain confidential information. If you have received this message in error, please send it back to me, and immediately delete it. Please do not use, copy or disclose the information contained in this message or in any attachment. Any views or opinions expressed by the author of this email do not necessarily reflect the views of the University of Nottingham.
This message has been checked for viruses but the contents of an attachment
may still contain software viruses which could damage your computer system:
you are advised to perform your own checks. Email communications with the
University of Nottingham may be monitored as permitted by UK legislation.
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/