Bookmark and Share

Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: st: mata orgtype


From   Nick Cox <[email protected]>
To   "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject   Re: st: mata orgtype
Date   Tue, 23 Apr 2013 08:19:23 +0100

I don't recall seeing this varying behaviour, but then again I don't
think I have ever tried this.

I think we'd need a reproducible example to comment.

Meanwhile, the main purpose of -levelsof- was, and is, to make
analyses easier in Stata. A near equivalent in Mata is to apply
-uniqrows()- to variables read in as vectors. I'd expect that to be
faster too.

Nick
[email protected]


On 23 April 2013 00:29, Tomáš Houška <[email protected]> wrote:

> I have a Stata macro generated by -levelsof- and I am trying to parse
> it in mata with -tokens- so that I can run mata loops with it...
> example:
>
> levelsof product, local(product_id)
> mata
> prods=tokens(st_local("product_id"))
> for(i = 1; i<=length(prods); i++) {
> ... commands including prods[i] ...
> }
> end
>
> My problem is that on some types of variables, the resulting mata item
> (in this case "prods") is a row vector, but sometimes it is a scalar
> string. Once it is a scalar string, I cannot refer to items on
> individual positions by -prods[i]- as I can do when it is a row
> vector.
> Is there a rule to which type gets created and when? Or is there a way
> to make sure that row vector  gets created?

*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/


© Copyright 1996–2018 StataCorp LLC   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index