Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: st: RE: Re: xtmixed with log-transfered dependent variable: back to non-log on margins and marginsplot
From
Nick Cox <[email protected]>
To
"[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject
Re: st: RE: Re: xtmixed with log-transfered dependent variable: back to non-log on margins and marginsplot
Date
Wed, 17 Apr 2013 18:22:32 +0100
It's -margins- that is complaining. That's part of official Stata. So, report
. about
. which gllamm
to provide a fuller picture of what you have installed.
Nick
[email protected]
On 17 April 2013 17:40, Sun, Wensheng <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Joseph,
>
> Thank you very much for the code. However, it seems my gllamm is different from your. The following is the error message.
>
> . margins, at(_Igirl_1=(0 1) age=(0(0.5)2.5))
> Warning: cannot perform check for estimable functions.
> e(sample) does not identify the estimation sample
> r(322);
>
> . margins , at(_Igirl_1 = (0 1) age = (0(0.5)2.5))
> Warning: cannot perform check for estimable functions.
> e(sample) does not identify the estimation sample
> r(322);
>
> I thought I already download everything I can get from gllamm including gllapred, runmlwin, and many others. Please help.
>
> Thanks.
>
> Wensheng
>
> ________________________________________
> From: [email protected] [[email protected]] On Behalf Of Joseph Coveney [[email protected]]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2013 9:06 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: st: Re: xtmixed with log-transfered dependent variable: back to non-log on margins and marginsplot
>
> Wensheng Sun wrote:
>
> Hi, Please help. How to do post multilevel regression estimation after gllamm? I
> tried "margins" command, it seems not work. Please fix it for me. Thanks.
>
> [snip]
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> You could try something like that below.
>
> If a variable is not a factor variable (that is, if it is not included in the
> model with the i.variable notation*), then it is considered by Stata to be a
> continuous variable. So, despite its being coded 0/1, _I_girl_1 is considered
> by Stata to be a continuous variable.
>
> -margins- requires its first arguments to be factor variables--variables that
> were in the model as i.variable. Because _I_girl_1 is a continuous variable and
> not a factor variable, you must treat it as a continuous variable when you refer
> to it with -margins-.
>
> Joseph Coveney
>
> *-anova- and -manova- are notable exceptions.
>
>
> [Model fitting omitted for brevity. To see it, look at my most recent post in
> this thread.]
>
> . margins , at(_Igirl_1 = (0 1) age = (0(0.5)2.5))
> Warning: cannot perform check for estimable functions.
>
> Predictive margins Number of obs = 198
> Model VCE : OIM
>
> Expression : predict()
>
> 1._at : age = 0
> _Igirl_1 = 0
>
> 2._at : age = 0
> _Igirl_1 = 1
>
> 3._at : age = .5
> _Igirl_1 = 0
>
> 4._at : age = .5
> _Igirl_1 = 1
>
> 5._at : age = 1
> _Igirl_1 = 0
>
> 6._at : age = 1
> _Igirl_1 = 1
>
> 7._at : age = 1.5
> _Igirl_1 = 0
>
> 8._at : age = 1.5
> _Igirl_1 = 1
>
> 9._at : age = 2
> _Igirl_1 = 0
>
> 10._at : age = 2
> _Igirl_1 = 1
>
> 11._at : age = 2.5
> _Igirl_1 = 0
>
> 12._at : age = 2.5
> _Igirl_1 = 1
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> | Delta-method
> | Margin Std. Err. z P>|z| [95% Conf. Interval]
> -------------+----------------------------------------------------------------
> _at |
> 1 | 1.828415 .042767 42.75 0.000 1.744593 1.912237
> 2 | 1.74101 .029594 58.83 0.000 1.683007 1.799013
> 3 | 1.99406 .0351737 56.69 0.000 1.925121 2.062999
> 4 | 1.906655 .0277658 68.67 0.000 1.852235 1.961075
> 5 | 2.159704 .0286555 75.37 0.000 2.103541 2.215868
> 6 | 2.072299 .0290146 71.42 0.000 2.015432 2.129167
> 7 | 2.325349 .0241011 96.48 0.000 2.278112 2.372586
> 8 | 2.237944 .0329929 67.83 0.000 2.173279 2.302609
> 9 | 2.490994 .0227236 109.62 0.000 2.446456 2.535531
> 10 | 2.403589 .0388715 61.83 0.000 2.327402 2.479775
> 11 | 2.656638 .0250527 106.04 0.000 2.607536 2.705741
> 12 | 2.569233 .0459263 55.94 0.000 2.479219 2.659247
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> *
> * For searches and help try:
> * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
> * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
> * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
> *
> * For searches and help try:
> * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
> * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
> * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/