Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
st: -egen total()- function and indexing within the -if- condition
From
A Loumiotis <[email protected]>
To
[email protected]
Subject
st: -egen total()- function and indexing within the -if- condition
Date
Mon, 15 Apr 2013 14:03:35 +0300
Hi,
I thought that the index number in the -if- condition is reseted to 1
at the beginning of every -by- group when generating a variable using
the -egen total()- function. It seems that this is not the case
though as the example below demonstrates:
********
clear
input int i j x
1 1 10
1 2 0
1 3 15
2 1 15
2 2 1
2 3 20
end
bys i:gen s2x=sum(x) if x[2]==1 & inlist(j,1,3)
bys i:egen t2x=total(x) if x[2]==1 & inlist(j,1,3)
bys i:gen s5x=sum(x) if x[5]==1 & inlist(j,1,3)
bys i:egen t5x=total(x) if x[5]==1 & inlist(j,1,3)
li, sepby(i)
+------------------------------------+
| i j x s2x t2x s5x t5x |
|------------------------------------|
1. | 1 1 10 . . . 25 |
2. | 1 2 0 . . . . |
3. | 1 3 15 . . . 25 |
|------------------------------------|
4. | 2 1 15 15 . . 35 |
5. | 2 2 1 . . . . |
6. | 2 3 20 35 . . 35 |
+------------------------------------+
*********
I expected that t2x and t5x would be missing whenever s2x and s5x is
missing but it is not. The results of the -sum()- function seems
logical to me given the -if- condition but not the results of the
-total()- function. Is this the normal behavior of the -total()-
function or is this a bug?
Best,
Antonis
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/