Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
st: Re: st: How does Stata’s ml handle missing log-likelihood values?
From
Maarten Buis <[email protected]>
To
[email protected]
Subject
st: Re: st: How does Stata’s ml handle missing log-likelihood values?
Date
Fri, 12 Apr 2013 10:26:03 +0200
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 4:54 AM, <[email protected]> wrote:
> In addition, I found that the estimates returned by “ml max, search(on)”
> sometimes were
> quite different from the estimates returned by “ml max, search(off)”.
That suggests that your likelihood function has multiple maxima. The
standard algorithms are designed for likelihood functions with a
single maximum, so in principle it would, in that case, not matter
which starting values you used. This is a serious problem and I don't
know an easy solution to that problem.
-- Maarten
---------------------------------
Maarten L. Buis
WZB
Reichpietschufer 50
10785 Berlin
Germany
http://www.maartenbuis.nl
---------------------------------
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/