Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: st: Stochastic Frontier
From
Federico Belotti <[email protected]>
To
[email protected]
Subject
Re: st: Stochastic Frontier
Date
Thu, 11 Apr 2013 23:04:49 +0200
Alexander,
my suggestion is to look at the following
http://ideas.repec.org/p/rtv/ceisrp/251.html
I hope it may be of some help to you in understanding pros and cons of SFs and how to model heterogeneity/heteroscedasticity of the inefficiency term.
Federico
On Apr 11, 2013, at 9:34 PM, Alexander wrote:
> Thank you very much for your response.
>
> There are about 600 banks in the dataset. There is a size-related variation between the observations as some of the banks are much larger then all others.
>
> I assume truncated normal distribution, however I am at loss regarding how to test for the heterogeneity/heteroscedasticity of the inefficiency term?
>
>
> Alexander
>
>
> 10.04.2013, 17:05, "Federico Belotti" <[email protected]>:
>> The results of your exercise may be driven from a bunch of things.
>> How many banks are there in your dataset? Do their cost, output and input prices show cross-sectional variation?
>>
>> Could you be more specific about your model?
>> Which distribution for the inefficiency term? What about heterogeneity/heteroscedasticity of the latter?
>>
>> Federico
>>
>> On Apr 10, 2013, at 2:17 PM, wdawd awdadw wrote:
>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I am trying to perform a stochastic frontier analysis on a cross-sectional data of sample of banks in one country to try to estimate banks' cost-efficiency using frontier stata function.
>>>
>>> I am using a translog function of total costs as a dependent value with 2 outputs and 2 input prices as regressors.
>>>
>>> My problem is that the results of the exercise (after I predict inefficiency estimates) are questionable with the estimates not materially differing from one another (hundreths) all of them rougly equal to 10. (10,345 10,352 10,356, etc.) which is quite strange.
>>>
>>> Are there any suggesitons on what's the reason behind this?
>>>
>>> Any help much appreciated.
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>> Alexander
>>> *
>>> * For searches and help try:
>>> * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
>>> * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
>>> * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
>>
>> --
>> Federico Belotti, PhD
>> Research Fellow
>> Centre for Economics and International Studies
>> University of Rome Tor Vergata
>> tel/fax: +39 06 7259 5627
>> e-mail: [email protected]
>> web: http://www.econometrics.it
>>
>> *
>> * For searches and help try:
>> * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
>> * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
>> * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
> *
> * For searches and help try:
> * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
> * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
> * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
--
Federico Belotti, PhD
Research Fellow
Centre for Economics and International Studies
University of Rome Tor Vergata
tel/fax: +39 06 7259 5627
e-mail: [email protected]
web: http://www.econometrics.it
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/