Bookmark and Share

Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: st: Statistical significance of standardized rates


From   Nick Cox <[email protected]>
To   "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject   Re: st: Statistical significance of standardized rates
Date   Thu, 4 Apr 2013 16:57:09 +0100

-dstdize- is a command, not a function.

Before you proceed further, note that the confidence intervals appear
to be of essentially zero length. That seems implausible, but if it's
true, any difference you like is significant at conventional levels.
Getting a P-value is moot. However, I'd be suspicious without being
sure that the instructions were correct.

Nick
[email protected]

On 4 April 2013 16:44, Karman Tandon <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've used the dstdize function to standardize/adjust across a number
> of variables. My data looks like this:
>
> Summary of Study Populations:
>      quartile        N      Crude     Adj_Rate       Confidence Interval
>  --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>         1           290   0.196552     0.060000    [  0.060000,    0.060000]
>         2           233   0.124464     0.030526    [  0.030526,    0.030526]
>         3           216   0.087963     0.020000    [  0.020000,    0.020000]
>         4           210   0.066667     0.014737    [  0.014737,    0.014737]
>
> How do I determine p-values for the significance of the adjusted rates
> compared to one another?
*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/


© Copyright 1996–2018 StataCorp LLC   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index