Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[no subject]
In any event, a P-value of .45 seems implausibly small.
As a statistician, I think you expect too much of the "statistical
reviewers" or of peer review more generally. Many papers that I read
contain rough edges and errors that, to my amazement, the authors and
the reviewers somehow failed to notice.
David Hoaglin
On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 9:38 AM, Ariel Linden, DrPH
<[email protected]> wrote:
> Thanks Adam and David. It's nice to know that I am not crazy. I also tried
> cci and iri and obviously got the same results as Adam. I am somewhat
> surprised that a paper in the Archives of Internal Medicine would not be
> scrutinized more closely by statistical reviewers.
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/