Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
st: FW: Why graph?
From
"Allan Reese (Cefas)" <[email protected]>
To
<[email protected]>
Subject
st: FW: Why graph?
Date
Fri, 22 Mar 2013 11:59:14 -0000
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 12:16 PM, Nick Cox <[email protected]> wrote:
> Worth noting that John Tukey in his Exploratory data analysis (Reading, MA,
> Addison-Wesley, 1977) did include a detailed example making it clear that
> box plots could not do justice to bimodality.
And this generalizes to the level of understanding. Statistics may be taught, and is often learned, as a set of formulae - pick the right test, get the arithmetic mechanically, and that's your "answer". People think "I'm doing a t-test" not "I'm comparing two means, on the assumption that the mean is the critical parameter for these groups." In respect of box plots and any other graph, are you drawing the graph to gain understanding of the data (analysis) or to demonstrate a feature that you have already identified (presentation)?
Allan
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/