Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: st: Interpretation of Two-sample t test with equal variances?
From
"JVerkuilen (Gmail)" <[email protected]>
To
[email protected]
Subject
Re: st: Interpretation of Two-sample t test with equal variances?
Date
Wed, 20 Mar 2013 20:45:10 -0400
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 7:50 PM, David Hoaglin <[email protected]> wrote:
> Jay,
>
> If the way people teach boxplots is the (main) source of the
> difficulty, I would not be inclined to blame the boxplot!
True.
> I'm not sure what you mean by "the box ends up being too big" if the
> data are light-tailed. I would expect the "whiskers" to be unusually
> short.
That was my way of saying that the whiskers were too short.
> A boxplot can do only so much. The display was not designed to reveal
> bimodal or multimodal data. A dotplot would usually show that
> structure easily.
Graphics, by their very nature, make assumptions about the data
because they provide data reduction. The boxplot provides a lot of
data reduction as it takes a variable from N observations down to 5
plus a few. So the boxplot's key assumption is that the data are
unimodal.
I guess I agree with Nick that they've been oversold, but as I say I use them.
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/