Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
R: st: Interpretation of Two-sample t test with equal variances?
From
"Carlo Lazzaro" <[email protected]>
To
<[email protected]>
Subject
R: st: Interpretation of Two-sample t test with equal variances?
Date
Wed, 20 Mar 2013 18:11:25 +0100
Dave is right.
Actually I have read Gwinyai's post too fast and suggested something wrong.
I am currently engaged in a project concerning pre-term delivery as
dependent variable, that I have mistaken as Gwinyai's y, too.
Anyway, provided that this is not a homework or an exercise on logistic
regression, I confirm my concerns about the limited number of predictors in
Gwinyai's model.
For instance, are all the women included in the model at their first
delivery?
Best regards,
Carlo
-----Messaggio originale-----
Da: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] Per conto di David Hoaglin
Inviato: mercoledì 20 marzo 2013 17:33
A: [email protected]
Oggetto: Re: st: Interpretation of Two-sample t test with equal variances?
Carlo,
What meaning do you assign to an interaction between mode_delivery (the
outcome variable) and age (the predictor)?
David Hoaglin
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 10:48 AM, Carlo Lazzaro
<[email protected]> wrote:
> Gwinyai,
> your Pseudo R2 = 0.0015 seems very low.
> Are you sure that all the relevant independent variables have been
> included in your model?
>
> You may also consider searching for interactions between mode_delivery
> & age.
>
> Best regards,
> Carlo
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/