Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Fwd: st: New package, -swain- : Correct small sample chi-square overidentification test
From
John Antonakis <[email protected]>
To
[email protected]
Subject
Fwd: st: New package, -swain- : Correct small sample chi-square overidentification test
Date
Wed, 20 Mar 2013 16:43:50 +0100
Austin Nichols kindly alerted me to a typo in the description, with
respect to the ratio of parameters to sample size problem (i.e,. when
that ratio is large, and not small as I said in the original e-mail).
Thus, the description, which is now more explicit should read:
swain corrects the chi-square test of fit for structural equation models
(with or without latent
variables). The chi-square statistic is asymptotically correct; however,
it does not behave as expected
in small samples (Kenny & McCoach, 2003) and/or when the model is
complex (Curren, Bollen, Paxton &
Kirby, 2002). Thus, particularly in situations where the ratio of the
number of parameters (p)
estimated to sample size (n) is relatively large (i.e., the n to p ratio
is small), the chi-square test
will tend to overreject correctly specified models. To obtain a closer
approximation to the
distribution of the chi-square statistic, Swain (1975) developed a
correction; this scaling factor,
which converges to 1 asymptotically, is multiplied with the chi-square
statistic. The resulting
correction better approximates the chi-square distribution resulting in
more appropriate Type 1 reject
error rates.
I have requested an update to the description and the help file.
Best,
J.
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: st: New package, -swain- : Correct small sample chi-square
overidentification test
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2013 13:11:53 +0100
From: John Antonakis <[email protected]>
Reply-To: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Hi:
With the usual thanks to Kit Baum, a new package -swain- is available on
SSC. This package should be interesting to those who estimate
structural equation models via -sem- (using maximum likelihood). It
might also be useful to those estimating models via two or three-stage
least squares, which can be also estimated with -sem-.*
Here is a description of -swain-: Correct small sample chi-square
overidentification test after -sem-
swain corrects the chi-square test of fit for structural
equation models (with or without latent variables). The
chi-square statistic is asymptotically correct; however, it does
not behave as expected in small samples (Kenny & McCoach, 2003)
and/or when the model is complex (Curren, Bollen, Paxton & Kirby,
2002). Thus, particularly in situations where the ratio of the
number of parameters estimated to sample size is relatively
small, the chi-square test will tend to overreject correctly
specified models. To obtain a closer approximation to the
distribution of the chi-square statistic, Swain (1975) developed
a correction; this scaling factor, which converges to 1
asymptotically, is multiplied with the chi-square statistic. The
resulting correction better approximates the chi-square
distribution resulting in more appropriate Type 1 reject error.
To install swain, simply type -ssc install swain- from the Stata command
line.
*How to estimate instrumental variable models via -sem-.
E.g. 1
ivregress 2sls y (x = z1 z2) z3
can be estimated in -sem- as:
sem (x <- z1 z2 z3) (y <- x z3) , cov(e.x*e.y)
cov(e.x*e.y) allows cross equations disturbances of x and y to correlate
(and it the Hausman test).
E.g. 2
reg3 (y = x1 z3) (x = z1 z2 z3 x2) (x2 = z4 z3)
can be estimated in -sem- as:
sem (y <- x1 z3) (x <- z1 z2 z3 x2) (x2 <- z4 z3), cov(e._OEn, unstructured)
The cov option above allows all cross-equation disturbances of
endogenous variables correlate. Thus, the Hausman test is the Wald test:
test (_b[cov(e.y,e.x1):_cons] = 0) (_b[cov(e.y,e.x2):_cons]=0)
(_b[cov(e.x1,e.x2):_cons]=0)
Note, the Hansen-Sargan overidentification statistic in 2sls is the
chi-square test of fit in sem (reported as the "LR test of model vs.
saturated model" on the bottom of the output). In small sample size
situations where there are many parameters to be estimated, -swain- will
correct this overidentification statistic.
Another advantage of using -sem- is that there are score tests
(modification indices or Langrange Multiplier tests) available after
estimation (-estat mindices-) that will identify model constraints that
are inconsistent with the data.
Best,
J.
--
__________________________________________
John Antonakis
Professor of Organizational Behavior
Director, Ph.D. Program in Management
Faculty of Business and Economics
University of Lausanne
Internef #618
CH-1015 Lausanne-Dorigny
Switzerland
Tel ++41 (0)21 692-3438
Fax ++41 (0)21 692-3305
http://www.hec.unil.ch/people/jantonakis
Associate Editor
The Leadership Quarterly
__________________________________________
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/