Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: st: RE: xtivreg2: confusing analytical samples reported
From
"Kemeny, Thomas Ernest" <[email protected]>
To
"<[email protected]>" <[email protected]>
Subject
Re: st: RE: xtivreg2: confusing analytical samples reported
Date
Tue, 19 Mar 2013 18:13:36 +0000
Aha - the number of singletons is exactly the difference between the two analytical samples.
Thanks Mark!
Sent from my iPhone
On Mar 19, 2013, at 11:59 AM, "Schaffer, Mark E" <[email protected]> wrote:
> So the singletons are probably the answer. xtivreg2 tells you how many
> there were, so that would confirm it.
>
> --Mark
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: [email protected] [mailto:owner-
>> [email protected]] On Behalf Of Kemeny, Thomas Ernest
>> Sent: 19 March 2013 14:05
>> To: <[email protected]>
>> Subject: Re: st: RE: xtivreg2: confusing analytical samples reported
>>
>> Hi Mark,
>>
>> Thanks for your help. Some answers:
>>
>> Versions: I am running stata 12.1; ivreg2 v3.0.06; xtivreg2 v1.0.12.
>>
>> Singletons: yes! It detects singleton groups, resulting in
> observations not
>> used.
>>
>> Coefficients- yes, same coefficients with or without partialling and
> clustered
>> SEs.
>>
>> Thanks!
>> Tom
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mar 18, 2013, at 4:28 PM, "Schaffer, Mark E"
> <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Tom,
>>>
>>> A few thoughts...
>>>
>>> 1. Can you report which versions of Stata, xtivreg2, ivreg2, etc.
> you
>>> are using? (As per the Statalist FAQ.)
>>>
>>> 2. Is xtivreg2 reporting anything about not using singleton
> observations? It
>> is more informative in this respect than the official xtivreg and
> xtreg
>> commands.
>>>
>>> 3. The coefficient estimates you obtain with
>>>
>>> xtivreg2 y (a = x z) b c d_* e_* f_*, fe ffirst partial(d_* e_* f_*)
>>> cluster(g)
>>>
>>> you can also obtain with official xtivreg:
>>>
>>> xtivreg2 y (a = x z) b c d_* e_* f_*, fe
>>>
>>> Are they the same?
>>>
>>> --Mark
>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: [email protected] [mailto:owner-
>>>> [email protected]] On Behalf Of Kemeny, Thomas Ernest
>>>> Sent: 18 March 2013 16:52
>>>> To: [email protected]
>>>> Subject: st: xtivreg2: confusing analytical samples reported
>>>>
>>>> I'm estimating a fixed effects model using annual panel data on
>>>> individuals.There is some reason to investigate potential bias due
> to
>>>> endogeneity of one predictor (let's call it variable a).
>>>>
>>>> My base model, ignoring endogeneity issues, is as follows:
>>>>
>>>> .xtreg y a b c i.(d e f), fe vce(cluster g)
>>>>
>>>> where d, e and f represent time, geography, and industry dummy
>> variables.
>>>> This model runs on a certain analytical sample. This all seems
> fine.
>>>> Here is where the trouble starts: starting from the same data, I
> then
>>>> want to run a 2SLS, using instruments x and z. Before I can do so,
> I
>>>> have to the generate the dummy variables for d, e and f, since the
>>>> i() subcommand will not work with xtivreg2.
>>>>
>>>> .qui tab d, gen (d_)
>>>> .qui tab e, gen (e_)
>>>> .qui tab f, gen (f_)
>>>>
>>>> Then I can run xtivreg2, as follows:
>>>>
>>>> .xtivreg2 y (a = x z) b c d_* e_* f_*, fe ffirst partial(d_* e_*
> f_*)
>>>> cluster(g)
>>>>
>>>> The thing is, xtivreg fe reports a smaller analytical sample than
>>>> xtreg fe -- more than a third less! And, even more curiously, if
>>>> after running the xtivreg2, I run the following
>>>>
>>>> .keep if e(sample)
>>>>
>>>> the kept analytical sample is actually the same as it was in the
>>>> original xtreg fe command.
>>>>
>>>> I am perplexed. Is ixtivreg2 mis-reporting the analytical sample?
> Or
>>>> is something else going on here?
>>>>
>>>> Weirder - when I run xtivreg, the native stata panel IV command,
> the
>>>> analytical sample here is the same as with xtreg fe, in other words
>>>> the sample issue disappears (but i cannot cluster SEs using
> xtivreg,
>>>> which i can do using xtivreg2).
>>>>
>>>> Any thoughts?
>>>>
>>>> Much thanks.
>>>> Tom
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Thomas Kemeny
>>>> Research Assistant Professor
>>>> Department of Public Policy
>>>> University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
> http://unc.edu/~tkemeny/
>>>> *
>>>> * For searches and help try:
>>>> * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
>>>> * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
>>>> * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
>>>
>>>
>>> -----
>>> Sunday Times Scottish University of the Year 2011-2013 Top in the UK
>>> for student experience Fourth university in the UK and top in
> Scotland
>>> (National Student Survey 2012)
>>>
>>> We invite research leaders and ambitious early career researchers to
>>> join us in leading and driving research in key inter-disciplinary
> themes.
>>> Please see www.hw.ac.uk/researchleaders for further information and
>>> how to apply.
>>>
>>> Heriot-Watt University is a Scottish charity registered under
> charity
>>> number SC000278.
>>>
>>>
>>> *
>>> * For searches and help try:
>>> * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
>>> * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
>>> * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
>>
>> *
>> * For searches and help try:
>> * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
>> * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
>> * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
>
>
> -----
> Sunday Times Scottish University of the Year 2011-2013
> Top in the UK for student experience
> Fourth university in the UK and top in Scotland (National Student Survey 2012)
>
> We invite research leaders and ambitious early career researchers to
> join us in leading and driving research in key inter-disciplinary themes.
> Please see www.hw.ac.uk/researchleaders for further information and how
> to apply.
>
> Heriot-Watt University is a Scottish charity
> registered under charity number SC000278.
>
>
> *
> * For searches and help try:
> * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
> * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
> * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/