Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: st: bifactor rotation
From
"JVerkuilen (Gmail)" <[email protected]>
To
[email protected]
Subject
Re: st: bifactor rotation
Date
Tue, 19 Mar 2013 10:02:06 -0400
On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 8:39 AM, Airey, David C
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Here was a reference:
>
> http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3253271/pdf/nihms341216.pdf
Good reference. The complexity I was remembering was for the higher
order factor analysis (Leiman-Schmid transformation). Obviously you
can set things up in -sem- as a confirmatory model.
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/