Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
From | Austin Nichols <austinnichols@gmail.com> |
To | statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu |
Subject | Re: st: Regression discontinuity with interrupted time series |
Date | Thu, 7 Mar 2013 13:56:51 -0500 |
Joshua Mitts <joshua.mitts@yale.edu>: If I were you, I would replicate the traditional RD analysis on long differences of different lengths, and try to interpret patterns in the estimated effects as indicative of how effects vary with time. You only have one instrument, and you seem to want to estimate both a jump at time t and a difference in trend from time t on, which amounts to two endogenous variables, treatment T and the interaction with time Tt. You can instrument for T and Tt with A=(Z>0) and At, using weights to limit your sample to a vicinity of the cutoff, in a panel regression model, with cluster-robust SE to deal with serially correlated errors. But assumptions are less tenable and interpretation is trickier than in the first case. On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 6:19 PM, Joshua Mitts <joshua.mitts@yale.edu> wrote: > Hi Austin, > > Thank you for taking the time to reply in such depth. Let me try to > clarify--I don't think I explained very clearly. I'm using a fuzzy RD > design with a numeric cutoff that determines eligibility for the > program. Treatment is taken by compliers at time t. I measure > subjects at repeated intervals prior to and following treatment. The > assumptions of non-manipulability of assignment variable, > monotonicity, and exclusion are valid at time t. > > I could stay in the world of traditional RD and observe differences at > t+5 minus t-5. But that seems unduly restrictive. * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/ * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/