Bookmark and Share

Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: st: RE: Midas


From   Nick Cox <[email protected]>
To   [email protected]
Subject   Re: st: RE: Midas
Date   Mon, 4 Mar 2013 15:35:12 +0000

Claudia, Setor:

Please heed requests in the FAQ:

0. "does not seem to be working" could mean about 20 different things.
Please spell out your evidence.

1. Explain where user-written commands you refer to come from
(-metan-, -midas-?).

2. Don't use obscure references that are likely to be unclear to many
(Revman?).

3. "Stata", not "STATA".


On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 3:08 PM, Setor Kunutsor <[email protected]> wrote:

> Have a look at the help file for metan and let me know if it helps
>
> .help metan

[email protected]

> I am trying to use MIDAS for a systematic review.
>
> The command:
> midas tp fp fn tn, bfor ford
> midas tp fp fn tn, bfor
> midas tp fp fn tn, ford
>
> does not seem to be working. I am trying to get a similar output to Revman with the description of the studies on the left and then the forest plot for sensitivity and specificity on the right.
>
> I am using STATA 12.
>
> Does anyone have experience with this and can help?
*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/


© Copyright 1996–2018 StataCorp LLC   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index