Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
| From | "JVerkuilen (Gmail)" <jvverkuilen@gmail.com> |
| To | statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu |
| Subject | Re: st: reliability with -icc- and -estat icc- |
| Date | Wed, 27 Feb 2013 15:37:00 -0500 |
FYI I ran the crossed models: xtmixed Score, || _all: R.Rator, covariance(identity) || Application:, covariance(independent) reml variance xtmixed Score if Rator != 4, || _all: R.Rator, covariance(identity) || Application:, covariance(independent) reml variance And got ICC estimates of 0.61 and 0.22, respectively, which are essentially the same as for the fixed effects on Application model, which isn't surprising. The clear difference between the crossed and random intercept model will be on the interval estimate, but that's not available here because estat icc doesn't work. -- JVVerkuilen, PhD jvverkuilen@gmail.com "It is like a finger pointing away to the moon. Do not concentrate on the finger or you will miss all that heavenly glory." --Bruce Lee, Enter the Dragon (1973) * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/ * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/