Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: st: Using outreg2 within a loop
From
Suryadipta Roy <[email protected]>
To
[email protected]
Subject
Re: st: Using outreg2 within a loop
Date
Wed, 13 Feb 2013 21:33:51 -0500
John,
Thank you very much indeed for the response! This is exactly what I
needed! I figured that -xttobit- does not return the adjusted
R-squared, but was carrying it over from another command.
Sincerely,
Suryadipta.
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 2:56 PM, John Luke Gallup <[email protected]> wrote:
> Suryadipta,
>
> There is probablly a way to do this in -outreg2-, but I am not familiar with its details.
>
> If it is useful, though, you can do what you are looking for with -outreg-, also an SSC user-written command:
>
> outreg, clear
> forvalues i = 1(1)5 {
> xttobit dep_var `controls' if period == `i', ll(0)
> outreg using "C\file.doc", bdec(2) squarebrack keep(var1 var2) ///
> summstat(r2_a) summtitle(Adj. R-squared) merge
> }
>
> The -keep- option strips off the sigma statistics (and the constant). Note that there doesn't seem to be an e(r2_a) statistic saved by -xttobit-, however. The outreg -merge- option can be used in the first iteration of a loop even if there is nothing to merge to, but it requires the -outreg, clear- command preceding the loop to prevent the endless accumulation of new columns of results when you rerun the .do file.
>
> John
>
>
> On Feb 13, 2013, at 6:43 AM, Suryadipta Roy <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Dear Statalisters,
>>
>> I am using the following form of code to get the regression results
>> within a table using -outreg2- :
>>
>> forvalues i = 1(1)5 {
>> xttobit dep_var `controls' if period == `i', ll(0)
>> outreg2 using "C:\file.doc", nocons tstat dec(2) bracket keep(var1
>> var2) addstat(Adj. R-squared, e(r2_a)) word label `append'
>> local append "append"
>> }
>>
>> When the file gets saved, two separate columns for "sigma_u" and
>> "sigma_e" are added for each of the five regressions. While I can
>> delete the columns manually, I was wondering if there is a suggestion
>> as to how to prevent them from appearing in the first place. Any
>> suggestion is greatly appreciated.
>>
>>
>> Sincerely,
>> Suryadipta.
>> *
>> * For searches and help try:
>> * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
>> * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
>> * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
>
>
> *
> * For searches and help try:
> * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
> * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
> * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/