Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
st: Hausman test after xtnbreg and alternatives?
From
Heewon Chae <[email protected]>
To
[email protected]
Subject
st: Hausman test after xtnbreg and alternatives?
Date
Mon, 11 Feb 2013 13:23:04 -0500
Hi All,
I am using xtnbreg and I want to decide whether to choose fixed or
random effects.
When I run
xtnbreg .... , fe
estimates store fixed
xtnbreg .... , re
estimates store random
hausman fixed random
I get this result:
Test: Ho: difference in coefficients not systematic
chi2(12) = (b-B)'[(V_b-V_B)^(-1)](b-B)
= -68.68 chi2<0 ==> model fitted on these
data fails to meet the asymptotic
assumptions of the Hausman test;
see suest for a generalized test
What other commands or approaches I can use to check which one to use?
Unfortunately, the alternative to hausman proposed in this list,
xtoverid, does not work for xtnbreg. I would be very grateful for any
comments or suggestions that helped me to decide whether fixed or
random effects are appropriate in my case.
Thank you!
Heewon
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/