Fwd: Re: st: Postestimation after NL Regression

[John Antonakis <John.Antonakis@unil.ch>]

Typo....meant to say:

nl, coeflegend

J.


-------- Original Message --------
Subject:     Re: st: Postestimation after NL Regression
Date:     Fri, 08 Feb 2013 19:55:52 +0100
From:     John Antonakis <John.Antonakis@unil.ch>
To:     statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu


After nl, run the following:

nl, coeflegent

Then you can see how they are named, e.g.,

test _b[b1:_cons] = 0

test ( _b[b1:_cons] = 0) ( _b[b1:_cons] =0)

Let's see if someone knows of an easier way.

HTH,
J.

__________________________________________

John Antonakis
Professor of Organizational Behavior
Director, Ph.D. Program in Management

Faculty of Business and Economics
University of Lausanne
Internef #618
CH-1015 Lausanne-Dorigny
Switzerland
Tel ++41 (0)21 692-3438
Fax ++41 (0)21 692-3305
http://www.hec.unil.ch/people/jantonakis

Associate Editor
The Leadership Quarterly
__________________________________________

On 08.02.2013 19:33, Scott Holupka wrote:
> I'm sure I'm making some sort of basic mistake, but I can't figure 
out how
> to run a postestimation test after computing a nonlinear regression.
>
> For instance, if my nl model is:
>
> nl (outcome = exp({b0} + {b1}*var1 + {b2}*var2 + {b3}*var3 + {b4}*var4))
>
> How do I test that b1 and b2 are greater than 0?
>
> The help nl postestimation indicates that I can use the test command, 
but I
> can't figure out how to format it correctly.
>
> Any help would be greatly appreciated.
>
> Scott
>
>
>
>
> *
> *   For searches and help try:
> *   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
> *   http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
> *   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/


*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/