Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
st: Problem with standard errors using eststo
From
Sutirtha Bagchi <[email protected]>
To
[email protected]
Subject
st: Problem with standard errors using eststo
Date
Wed, 6 Feb 2013 09:33:30 -0500
I am having a problem with standard errors using eststo.
My problem is that if I estimate a regression without using eststo and
then estimate exactly the same regression with eststo, my standard
errors change. This is a problem which had been raised about a year
ago in this post:
http://www.stata.com/statalist/archive/2012-01/msg00085.html and
although the final verdict on this from Nick Cox was that "-eststo- is
not
in any sense changing standard errors and that your main problem lies
elsewhere", I am not so sure that the advice holds in my case. In any
event, I am attaching the two lines of code that I run and the output
that I get from those. Please note how the standard errors (and the
associated t-stats) change when I use eststo in the second line of
code.
Line of code #1: xi: xtreg fundratio compttve7, fe cluster(county)
Line of code #2: eststo: xi: xtreg fundratio compttve7, fe cluster(county)
Output from line of code #1:
Fixed-effects (within) regression Number of obs = 3385
Group variable: municipali~m Number of groups = 1262
R-sq: within = 0.0266 Obs per group: min = 1
between = 0.0000
avg = 2.7
overall = 0.0042
max = 3
F(1,64)
= 12.52
corr(u_i, Xb) = -0.1392 Prob > F = 0.0008
(Std. Err. adjusted for 65 clusters in county)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Robust
fundratio | Coef. Std. Err. t P>|t| [95% Conf. Interval]
-------------+----------------------------------------------------------------
compttve7 | -336.4875 95.10119 -3.54 0.001 -526.4739 -146.501
_cons | 115.1093 10.24336 11.24 0.000 94.64585 135.5728
-------------+----------------------------------------------------------------
sigma_u | 116.71559
sigma_e | 91.487051
rho | .61941958 (fraction of variance due to u_i)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Output from line of code #2:
Fixed-effects (within) regression Number of obs = 3385
Group variable: municipali~m Number of groups = 1262
R-sq: within = 0.0266 Obs per group: min = 1
between = 0.0000
avg = 2.7
overall = 0.0042
max = 3
F(1,64)
= 7.85
corr(u_i, Xb) = -0.1392 Prob > F = 0.0067
(Std. Err. adjusted for 65 clusters in county)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Robust
fundratio | Coef. Std. Err. t P>|t| [95% Conf. Interval]
-------------+----------------------------------------------------------------
compttve7 | -336.4875 120.0782 -2.80 0.007 -576.3713 -96.60364
_cons | 115.1093 12.93364 8.90 0.000 89.2714 140.9472
-------------+----------------------------------------------------------------
sigma_u | 116.71559
sigma_e | 91.487051
rho | .61941958 (fraction of variance due to u_i)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(est146 stored)
I should also mention that this problem comes up only when I am using
the cluster option. That is, when I run:
xi: xtreg fundratio compttve7, fe and eststo: xi: xtreg fundratio
compttve7, fe, I get exactly the same results (i.e. same standard
errors and same t-stats). Also, I have updated all my packages using
adoupdate and given the status message: "(no packages require
updating)"
I look forward to hearing the listserv's solutions to the problem.
Thank you,
Sutirtha Bagchi
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/