Bookmark and Share

Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: st: Adjusted R-squared comparison


From   John Antonakis <[email protected]>
To   [email protected]
Subject   Re: st: Adjusted R-squared comparison
Date   Wed, 06 Feb 2013 11:49:38 +0100

Can't agree more with you Nick. We should care more about having consistent estimators than high r-squares (i.e., Panagiotis, what I mean here is that we can still estimate the slope consistently even if we don't have a tight fitting regression line). So, I don't know why you are interested in this comparison, Panagiotis. I would think you would be more interested in comparing estimates, as in a Chow test (Chow, G. C. (1960). Tests of equality between sets of coefficients in two linear regressions. Econometrica, 28(3), 591-605). If you are using fixed-effects models, you can model the fixed-effects with dummies and then do a Chow test via suest....see -help suest-.

Best,
J.

__________________________________________

John Antonakis
Professor of Organizational Behavior
Director, Ph.D. Program in Management

Faculty of Business and Economics
University of Lausanne
Internef #618
CH-1015 Lausanne-Dorigny
Switzerland
Tel ++41 (0)21 692-3438
Fax ++41 (0)21 692-3305
http://www.hec.unil.ch/people/jantonakis

Associate Editor
The Leadership Quarterly
__________________________________________

On 06.02.2013 11:40, Nick Cox wrote:
That's positive advice.

My own other idea is that adjusted R-squares are a lousy basis to
compare two models, even of the same kind. They leave out too much
information.

Nick

On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 10:37 AM, John Antonakis <[email protected]> wrote:
I think that the only think you can do is to bootstrap the r-squares and see
if their confidence intervals overlap.

To bootstrap you just do:

E.g.,

sysuse auto
bootstrap e(r2), seed(123) reps(1000) : reg price mpg weight

You will be interested in either:

       e(r2_w)             R-squared within model
       e(r2_o)             R-squared overall model
       e(r2_b)             R-squared between model

See help xtreg with respect to saved results.

Let's see if others have other ideas.
On 06.02.2013 10:22, Panagiotis Manganaris wrote:

I need to compare two adjusted r-squared of the same model for two
different periods of time (each one spans for a period of years). So far, I
have split my data in two groups, those that belong to the period 1998-2004
and those that belong to the period 2005-2011. Then I used xtreg on the same
model for each group of data. I've derived their adjusted r-squared and I
want to know if those two adjusted r-squared are significantly different
from each other.
*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/


© Copyright 1996–2018 StataCorp LLC   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   Site index