Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: st: constrained tobit regression?
From
Nick Cox <[email protected]>
To
[email protected]
Subject
Re: st: constrained tobit regression?
Date
Mon, 4 Feb 2013 13:10:08 +0000
The comma on a command line that indicates the divide between options
and everything else is a toggle, like an on-off light switch. One
comma flips from
"this stuff isn't an option call"
to
"this stuff is option calls"
and subsequent commas reverse whatever is the current state. This
doesn't appear to be quite universal, but for example this works:
. sysuse auto
(1978 Automobile Data)
. summarize weight , detail, if foreign
Weight (lbs.)
-------------------------------------------------------------
Percentiles Smallest
1% 1760 1760
5% 1830 1830
10% 1930 1930 Obs 22
25% 2020 1980 Sum of Wgt. 22
50% 2180 Mean 2315.909
Largest Std. Dev. 433.0035
75% 2650 2750
90% 2830 2830 Variance 187492
95% 3170 3170 Skewness 1.056582
99% 3420 3420 Kurtosis 3.368013
I wouldn't, however, recommend that anybody work like this unless you
have an essentially perfect understanding of Stata syntax, in which
case you don't need it.
Nick
On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 1:00 PM, Maarten Buis <[email protected]> wrote:
In a Stata
> command the comma indicates "all that follows are options", so you do
> not separate options with commas.
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/