Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: st: Wishlist for Stata 13
From
Nick Cox <[email protected]>
To
[email protected]
Subject
Re: st: Wishlist for Stata 13
Date
Mon, 28 Jan 2013 21:40:01 +0000
David and others on versions before the present can always access
basic help for the current version on-line:
http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?confirm
The links at the foot of every Statalist posting give another example.
In this case I would try -quietly describe using <filename>- and see
if it's a Stata data file that you can read. If it's not, there will
be an error message.
Nick
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 9:32 PM, David Kantor <[email protected]> wrote:
> I have a wish, based on Stata 10. So I don't know if this has been taken
> care of in Stata 11 or 12.
>
> When using -confirm new file- or -confirm file-, it would be good if the
> file name could (optionally) be checked for the possibility of it being a
> .dta file.
> That is, suppose the filename is in a macro "filename", and my code looks
> like...
>
> confirm new file `filename'
> ...
> save `filename'
>
> Most of the time, I should really check...
> confirm new file `filename'.dta
> --as Stata interprets `filename' as `filename'.dta when saving it as a
> dataset. Thus, if I test only
> confirm new file `filename'
> and `filename' is "abc", and the file abc.dta exists, but abc (no dot) does
> not, then the -confirm- will pass, but the -save- will fail.
>
> The solution would seem to be to test...
> confirm new file `filename'.dta
> But it is not always correct, either, as there is an exception: if the name
> already has a "." in it, then -save- does not append ".dta".
> So the robust way to code this, as I see it, is...
> if strpos("`filename'", ".") {
> confirm new file `filename'
> }
> else {
> confirm new file `filename'.dta
> }
>
> or the equivalent one-liner:
> confirm new file `filename'`=cond(strpos("`filename'", "."), "", ".dta")'
>
> But I don't want to write all of that every time. It would be nice if that
> were built-in to -confirm-. Perhaps it would be a new syntax, such as
> -confirm new dta file- filename.
> Has anyone else had this issue?
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/