Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
st: RE: QUAIDS
From
Murat Genc <[email protected]>
To
"'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>
Subject
st: RE: QUAIDS
Date
Sat, 26 Jan 2013 09:23:50 +0000
Hi Nigussie,
I'm sure Brian will explain himself what is wrong here, but why don't you just use the 'quaids' command in Poi (2012) SJ 12-3 and include pdf and cdf variables as demographic variables as shown in the paper?
I have been estimating a demand system myself recently, catering for zero budget shares. Are you sure that the way you are taking into account the bias due to zero consumption is right? I haven't come across your procedure.
Murat
Dr M Genç
Department of Economics
University of Otago
P O Box 56
Dunedin 9054, New Zealand
_______________________________________
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of nigussie Tefera
Sent: Saturday, 26 January 2013 9:11 p.m.
To: [email protected]
Subject: st: QUAIDS
Dear stata list users,
I am trying to modify Poi's (2008) nlsurqaids.ado incorporte household demographics and village/regional dummies in the system as well as to include commulative distribution function (CDF) and probability distribution (CDF) so as to take into account bias due to zero consumtion expenditure (observed zero consumption expenditure). But I do not seem to be able to create a function evaluator program. I suppose I am missing something obvious…
Here is the program :
program nlsurquaidsNNP
version 12.1
syntax varlist(min=16 max=16) if, at(name)
tokenize `varlist'
args w1 w2 w3 lnp1 lnp2 lnp3 lnp4 lnm x1 x2 pdf1 pdf2 pdf3 cdf1 cdf2 cdf3
// With four goods, there are 15 parameters that can be
// estimated, after eliminating one of the goods and
// imposing adding up, symmetry, and homogeneity
// constraints, in the QUAIDS model
// Here, we extract those parameters from the `at'
// vector, and impose constraints as we go along
tempname a1 a2 a3 a4
scalar `a1' = `at'[1,1]
scalar `a2' = `at'[1,2]
scalar `a3' = `at'[1,3]
scalar `a4' = 1 - `a1' - `a2' - `a3'
tempname b1 b2 b3 b4
scalar `b1' = `at'[1,4]
scalar `b2' = `at'[1,5]
scalar `b3' = `at'[1,6]
scalar `b4' = -`b1' - `b2' - `b3'
tempname g11 g12 g13 g14
tempname g21 g22 g23 g24
tempname g31 g32 g33 g34
tempname g41 g42 g43 g44
scalar `g11' = `at'[1,7]
scalar `g12' = `at'[1,8]
scalar `g13' = `at'[1,9]
scalar `g14' = -`g11' - `g12' - `g13'
scalar `g21' = `g12'
scalar `g22' = `at'[1,10]
scalar `g23' = `at'[1,11]
scalar `g24' = -`g21' - `g22' - `g23'
scalar `g31' = `g13'
scalar `g32' = `g23'
scalar `g33' = `at'[1,12]
scalar `g34' = -`g31' - `g32' - `g33'
scalar `g41' = `g14'
scalar `g42' = `g24'
scalar `g43' = `g34'
scalar `g44' = -`g41' - `g42' - `g43'
tempname l1 l2 l3 l4
scalar `l1' = `at'[1,13]
scalar `l2' = `at'[1,14]
scalar `l3' = `at'[1,15]
scalar `l4' = -`l1' - `l2' - `l3'
// constant and household demographics
tempname r11 r12
tempname r21 r22
tempname r31 r32
scalar `r11' = `at'[1,16]
scalar `r12' = `at'[1,17]
scalar `r21' = `at'[1,18]
scalar `r22' = `at'[1,19]
scalar `r31' = `at'[1,20]
scalar `r32' = `at'[1,21]
// pdf
tempname d1 d2 d3
scalar `d1' = `at'[1,22]
scalar `d2' = `at'[1,23]
scalar `d3' = `at'[1,24]
// Okay, now that we have all the parameters, we can
// calculate the expenditure shares.
quietly {
// First get the price index
// I set a_0 = 5
tempvar lnpindex
gen double `lnpindex' = 5 + `a1'*`lnp1' + `a2'*`lnp2' ///
+ `a3'*`lnp3' + `a4'*`lnp4'
forvalues i = 1/4 {
forvalues j = 1/4 {
replace `lnpindex' = `lnpindex' + ///
0.5*`g`i'`j''*`lnp`i''*`lnp`j''
}
}
// The b(p) term in the QUAIDS model:
tempvar bofp
gen double `bofp' = 0
forvalues i = 1/4 {
replace `bofp' = `bofp' + `lnp`i''*`b`i''
}
replace `bofp' = exp(`bofp')
// Finally, the expenditure shares for 3 of the 4
// goods (the fourth is dropped to avoid singularity)
replace `w1' = (`a1' + `g11'*`lnp1' + `g12'*`lnp2' + ///
`g13'*`lnp3' + `g14'*`lnp4' + ///
`b1'*(`lnm' - `lnpindex') + ///
`l1'/`bofp'*(`lnm' - `lnpindex')^2 + ///
`r11'*`x1' +`r12'*`x2')*`cdf1'+
`d1'*`pdf1'
replace `w2' = (`a2' + `g21'*`lnp1' + `g22'*`lnp2' + ///
`g23'*`lnp3' + `g24'*`lnp4' + ///
`b2'*(`lnm' - `lnpindex') + ///
`l2'/`bofp'*(`lnm' - `lnpindex')^2 + ///
`r21'*`x1' +`r22'*`x2')*`cdf2' +
`d2'*`pdf2'
replace `w3' = (`a3' + `g31'*`lnp1' + `g32'*`lnp2' + ///
`g33'*`lnp3' + `g34'*`lnp4' + ///
`b3'*(`lnm' - `lnpindex') + ///
`l3'/`bofp'*(`lnm' - `lnpindex')^2 + ///
`r31'*`x1' +`r32'*`x2')*`cdf3' +
`d3'*`pdf3'
}
end
using food.dta data of Poi's (2008), I tried to run the programe but it came up with "nlsurquaidsNNP returned 198 verify that nlsurquaidsNNP is a function evaluator program"
I would apperciate any suggestion or help...
Nigussie
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/