Re: st: Levelsof for more than one Variable

[Roberto Liebscher <roberto.liebscher@ku.de>]

This perfectly did the Job. Thank you very much, Nick!

--
Roberto Liebscher
Catholic University of Eichstaett-Ingolstadt
Department of Business Administration
Chair of Banking and Finance
Auf der Schanz 49
D-85049 Ingolstadt

Am 21.01.2013 17:34, schrieb Nick Cox:
> I think you will need to use compound double quotes.
>
> Compare the results of
>
> sysuse auto, clear
> levelsof make in 1/10, local(levels)
> di "`levels'"
> di `"`levels'"'
>
> Nick
>
> On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 4:22 PM, Roberto Liebscher
> <roberto.liebscher@ku.de> wrote:
> > Thanks Maarten for the kind help. However I still haven't managed to get the
> > code working.
> >
> > Like you said I typed
> >
> > levelsof var1, local(loc1)
> > levelsof var2, local(loc2)
> >
> >
> > // stack the macros
> > // NOTICE: no "=" sign
> > local loc "`loc1' `loc2'"
> >
> >
> > // get rid of the duplicates
> > local loc : list uniq loc
> >
> > But when I type
> >
> > display "`loc'"
> >
> > to get the final list an error message is prompted saying
> >
> > `ABN not found
> > r(111);
> >
> > where ABN is part of the first element of loc1 ("ABN Amro Bank"). Is it a
> > problem that my elements in the list contain blank spaces? Is there a way
> > around? I already tried the same code with the blank space being replaced by
> > "_" (using subinstr). Following this another error message pops up saying
> > "`unknown function ABN_AMRO_Bank_N.V."' `"BNP_Paribas"'" . I do not know
> > what is wrong here. Any help is highly appreciated.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Roberto
> >
> >
> > --
> > Roberto Liebscher
> > Catholic University of Eichstaett-Ingolstadt
> > Department of Business Administration
> > Chair of Banking and Finance
> > Auf der Schanz 49
> > D-85049 Ingolstadt
> > Germany
> >
> > Am 21.01.2013 15:52, schrieb Nick Cox:
> > > As a kind of meta-comment I recommend against the use of "unique" in
> > > this context.
> > >
> > > "Unique" means occurring once only. It's a good word, and best left to
> > > mean that, as your school teachers may have urged. For example,
> > > "StataCorp is a unique company". Very true (if also trite).
> > >
> > > Naturally, some might want to start the age-old discussion of whether
> > > usage sanctifies abuse of etymology.  But even descriptively-inclined
> > > dictionaries don't seem to sanction the sense of this word "unique" as
> > > meaning "distinct", which I suggest is a much better word than
> > > "unique" for this purpose.
> > >
> > > My guess is that the popularity of "unique" in this meaning stems
> > > partly from Unix utilities such as -uniq-, which removes copies from a
> > > list and leaves one and one copy of each distinct item as a result.
> > > Thus
> > >
> > > a a a b b c
> > >
> > > would be reduced to
> > >
> > > a b c
> > >
> > > by such utilities.
> > >
> > > Here uniqueness defines each item in the result, not each item in the
> > > argument. My guess is that many software developers encountered such
> > > utilities such as -uniq- in their youth and that had a greater
> > > influence on them than their English dictionaries (if they had one) or
> > > their English teachers (if they paid them much attention).
> > >
> > > I have a long-term plan to persuade StataCorp of this too. See also
> > >
> > > SJ-8-4  dm0042  . . . . . . . . . . . .  Speaking Stata: Distinct
> > > observations
> > >           (help distinct if installed)  . . . . . .  N. J. Cox and G. M.
> > > Longton
> > >           Q4/08   SJ 8(4):557--568
> > >           shows how to answer questions about distinct observations
> > >           from first principles; provides a convenience command
> > >
> > > I can't speak authoritatively on languages other than English -- "not
> > > even", some might think -- so not mentioning them means only that.
> > >
> > > Nick
> > >
> > > On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 2:30 PM, Maarten Buis <maartenlbuis@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > > // collect the values
> > > > levelsof var1, locals(loc1)
> > > > levelsof var2, locals(loc2)
> > > >
> > > > // stack the macros
> > > > // NOTICE: no "=" sign
> > > > local loc "`loc1' `loc2'"
> > > >
> > > > // get rid of the duplicates
> > > > local loc : list uniq loc
> > > >
> > > > For more see: -help extended_fcn- and especially -help macrolists-
> > > >
> > > > Hope this helps,
> > > > Maarten
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 3:02 PM, Roberto Liebscher
> > > > <roberto.liebscher@ku.de> wrote:
> > > > > I have two variables both containing string values. I would like to get
> > > > > all
> > > > > unique values (not the number of unique values) from these two variables
> > > > > jointly.
> > > > >
> > > > > For example if I enter
> > > > >
> > > > > levelsof var1, locals(loc1)
> > > > > levelsof var2, locals(loc2)
> > > > >
> > > > > I obtain all unique values of var1 and all unique values of var2. But at
> > > > > the
> > > > > end I would like to have one local containing only unique values in loc1
> > > > > AND
> > > > > loc2.
> > > > >
> > > > > Is there anyone who can help me with this?
> > > *
> > >
> > > *   For searches and help try:
> > > *   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
> > > *   http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
> > > *   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
> >
> > *
> > *   For searches and help try:
> > *   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
> > *   http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
> > *   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
> *
> *   For searches and help try:
> *   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
> *   http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
> *   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/