Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: st: Low varability in dependent as a reason for period differing regression results?
From
"Birk Teuchert" <[email protected]>
To
[email protected]
Subject
Re: st: Low varability in dependent as a reason for period differing regression results?
Date
Tue, 15 Jan 2013 13:22:06 +0100
Thanks for the quick reply Nick!
could you explain more precisely how i do the plots and what you with a different scale (i.e. the commands -glm or link(log)-?
Regarding your third point: i dont think that the predictors should play different roles in the two regressions..
Thanks a lot
-------- Original-Nachricht --------
> Datum: Tue, 15 Jan 2013 12:09:00 +0000
> Von: Nick Cox <[email protected]>
> An: [email protected]
> Betreff: Re: st: Low varability in dependent as a reason for period differing regression results?
> Plot observed vs predicted and residual vs predicted for each
> regression. You can do this regardless of how complicated each
> regression is. R-square is the square of the correlation between
> observed and predicted for plain regression, so such graphs make
> explicit what underlies each R-square.
>
> With a difference of means that is an order of magnitude, you may be
> better off modelling on some different scale, e.g. -glm, link(log)-.
>
> You do also need to check whether predictors play similar roles in each
> case.
>
> Nick
>
> On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 12:00 PM, Birk Teuchert <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > I have problems identifying the reasons for the differing results for 2
> different time periods (the general regression equation is the same for
> both periods) i would like to do my analysis seperatly with.
> > How can I identify possible reasons for the differing results?
> >
> > I had a look at the descriptives and indeed I noticed that mean (10
> times higher) and SD (4 times hihger) of my dependent is a lot higher for one
> time period which results in an R2 of 30% compared to 4% in the other time
> period.
> >
> > Is this difference in the distribution of the dependent variable enough
> to explain the different results or how do I identify possible other
> explanations??
> *
> * For searches and help try:
> * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
> * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
> * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/