Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
From | Nick Cox <njcoxstata@gmail.com> |
To | statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu |
Subject | Re: st: Coefficient Constraints as Counterfactuals |
Date | Thu, 10 Jan 2013 18:41:14 +0000 |
If you want say to -regress- such that y = b_0 + b_1 x_1 + 42 x_2 then calculate y - 42 x_2 and -regress- on x_1. Naturally, this isn't universal, but what could be universal across all possible estimation commands? Moral: You should tell us more about the command you are using. Nick On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 6:25 PM, Matthew C Mahutga <matthew.mahutga@ucr.edu> wrote: > I have a question that I hope has an easy answer that escapes me. > > I am using estimation command that does not support the constraints option, but I would like to constrain a select group of coefficients. For example, one model includes an interaction term between a given socioeconomic process and a dummy variable for institutional regime. I would like to ask questions like "what would the trend in my outcome look like if the socioeconomic process had the larger of the two conditional (i.e. by regime type) effects". > > Is there a universal means by which to set a given coefficient to a fixed value prior to model estimation. Or, can I estimate predicted values using stored results but change the coefficient on one covariate beforehand? * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/ * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/