Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
From | Bülent Köksal <bkoksal@gmail.com> |
To | statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu |
Subject | st: large sample bias |
Date | Thu, 3 Jan 2013 17:17:12 +0200 |
Dear All, Is there a concept called large sample bias? If so, can this occur for a panel fixed effects estimation? When we have a sufficiently large sample (as in some market microstructure studies that use high-frequency data), probably all RHS variables will be significant. This is expected as the large sample size allows us to estimate the parameters with high precision. Now I understand that when the sample size is huge, it would be a good idea to include some sort of discussion about economic significance of the coefficients since these coefficients will be statistically significant even if they are very close to zero. But are there any other problems with a large sample? I thought a large sample size would always be a good thing. -- Bülent Köksal * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/ * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/