Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
st: recode foreach with sysmis versus dot
From 
 
annoporci <[email protected]> 
To 
 
"[email protected]" <[email protected]> 
Subject 
 
st: recode foreach with sysmis versus dot 
Date 
 
Mon, 24 Dec 2012 20:53:09 +0800 
Dear Statalist,
My question here is pure curiosity as I have found a workaround. No  
urgency.
In a dataset I have, I need to replace zeros with "missing" for all  
variables in the dataset.
A recent statalist exchange suggested the use of recode with a foreach  
loop. That suggestion was to turn a missing value into zeros --- the  
reverse of what I'm after --- so I tried to adapt the suggestion:
recode myvar (mis = 0)
The reverse:
recode myvar (0 = mis)
But that and other similar attempts failed. The "dot" sysmiss approach  
worked, so that's what I'm using now:
recode myvar (0 = .)
<CODE>
 use auto,clear
 local variables rep78
 foreach var of varlist `variables'{
*   recode `var'(3=mis) /// fails
*   recode `var'(3=sysmiss) /// fails
*   recode `var'(3=missing) /// fails
*   recode `var'(3=`missing') /// fails
*   recode `var'(3=-9999) /// works
   recode `var'(3=.) /// works
 }
<\CODE>
Reference:
http://www.stata.com/statalist/archive/2010-08/msg00410.html
http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?missing
--
Patrick Toche.
*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
*   http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/