Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
st: recode foreach with sysmis versus dot
From
annoporci <[email protected]>
To
"[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject
st: recode foreach with sysmis versus dot
Date
Mon, 24 Dec 2012 20:53:09 +0800
Dear Statalist,
My question here is pure curiosity as I have found a workaround. No
urgency.
In a dataset I have, I need to replace zeros with "missing" for all
variables in the dataset.
A recent statalist exchange suggested the use of recode with a foreach
loop. That suggestion was to turn a missing value into zeros --- the
reverse of what I'm after --- so I tried to adapt the suggestion:
recode myvar (mis = 0)
The reverse:
recode myvar (0 = mis)
But that and other similar attempts failed. The "dot" sysmiss approach
worked, so that's what I'm using now:
recode myvar (0 = .)
<CODE>
use auto,clear
local variables rep78
foreach var of varlist `variables'{
* recode `var'(3=mis) /// fails
* recode `var'(3=sysmiss) /// fails
* recode `var'(3=missing) /// fails
* recode `var'(3=`missing') /// fails
* recode `var'(3=-9999) /// works
recode `var'(3=.) /// works
}
<\CODE>
Reference:
http://www.stata.com/statalist/archive/2010-08/msg00410.html
http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?missing
--
Patrick Toche.
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/