Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: st: Looping over variables
From
Nick Cox <[email protected]>
To
[email protected]
Subject
Re: st: Looping over variables
Date
Tue, 18 Dec 2012 10:13:36 +0000
I agree with Daniel's main advice. You can simplify this (e.g.)
gen n_preg = 0
forval j = 95(6)149 {
local J = `j' + 1
replace n_preg = n_preg + inlist(aa`j', 1, 5) | (inlist(aa`j', 2, 3,
4, 6, 7) & inrange(aa`J', 13, .))
}
See also for specific and general advice:
[D] functions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . inlist() programming function
(help inlist())
[D] functions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . inrange() programming function
(help inrange())
SJ-9-1 pr0046 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Speaking Stata: Rowwise
(help rowsort, rowranks if installed) . . . . . . . . . . . N. J. Cox
Q1/09 SJ 9(1):137--157
shows how to exploit functions, egen functions, and Mata
for working rowwise; rowsort and rowranks are introduced
SJ-6-4 dm0026 . . . . . . Stata tip 39: In a list or out? In a range or out?
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . N. J. Cox
Q4/06 SJ 6(4):593--595 (no commands)
tip for use of inlist() and inrange()
It seems also that the names of your variables bear little relation to
their contents. Systematic use of -rename- is likely to make further
analysis much easier (and less error-prone).
Finally, for "STATA" read "Stata", and please read the Statalist FAQ
to see why.
Nick
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 8:47 AM, daniel klein <[email protected]> wrote:
> You could probably create a loop over the values 95, 101 and so on,
> and add 1 to the respective number inside the loop to get at the
> durration. But I would look at -egen-'s -anycount()- function first.
> This might be a good way of approching this.
Ingeborg Forthun
> [...]
> I want to make a variable that counts the number of pregnancies for each
> woman if outcome is 1 or 5 or if outcome is 2,3,4,6 or 7 and number of
> weeks of pregnancy was more than 12 weeks. Number of weeks of
> pregnancy is given by aa96 (corresponding to the outcome of the first
> pregnancy given by aa95), aa102 (corresponding to the outcome of the
> second pregnancy given by aa101), and so on.
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/