Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: st: asclogit vs mixlogit
From
"JVerkuilen (Gmail)" <[email protected]>
To
[email protected]
Subject
Re: st: asclogit vs mixlogit
Date
Tue, 4 Dec 2012 14:41:23 -0500
On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 11:41 AM, elisabetta capobianco
<[email protected]> wrote:
> Dear Statalist,
>
> I have done an asclogit and a mixlogit.
> What does it means that mixlogit coefficients are bigger than asclogit ones?
> And is there a command to evaluate the preference and have the
> coefficient for a product that is both bio and origine and trasport?
> Thank you for your help.
Caveat: It's not 100% clear to me that these models are actually
comparable due to a number of well-known indeterminacies. Hopefully
someone who runs these models on a regular basis can comment.
Note that the mixlogit log-likelihood is much better than that of
asclogit, so the former model fits much better.
What often happens with a mixed model is that its coefficients will be
more extreme than the population-averaged ones implied by the asclogit
model. This is because the asclogit coefficients have to compromise if
there is random variation between respondents and are pulled towards 0
as a consequence due to the nonlinearity of the logit link function.
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/