Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: st: Problems running spost9_ado on Stata 10 with _ms_omit_info
From
Nick Cox <[email protected]>
To
[email protected]
Subject
Re: st: Problems running spost9_ado on Stata 10 with _ms_omit_info
Date
Tue, 4 Dec 2012 13:01:20 +0000
Note that good Statalist practice is to say _where_ you got
user-written versions from .
-_ms_omit_info- is a built-in Stata command. In Stata 12.1 I get
. which _ms_omit_info
built-in command: _ms_omit_info
Evidently, the version of -spost9_ado- you are using requires a
version of Stata that includes _ms_omit_info.
Although spost9_ado is billed as for Stata 9 up, in practice it does
require a higher version, specifically Stata 11 up.
Note that the -version 9- statements in the package code make no
difference to that, as -version- is not a time machine. For
elucidation if desired see
FAQ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . User-written programs and Stata version
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . N. J. Cox
7/11 I have a certain version of Stata and have come
across a user-written program that is apparently
written for a later version of Stata. What are
my options?
http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/programming/
user-written-programs-and-stata-version/
Fernando needs to upgrade Stata, or to find an older version of
-spost*-, or (in principle at least) to rewrite -spost*- so that it
works on his Stata. The last is the most work, and the first is the
most expenditure.
Nick
On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 11:08 AM, Fernando Terres <[email protected]> wrote:
> I'm having problems running spost9_ado on Stata (version 10MP).
> The problems are related to some procedure called _ms_omit_info
> After issuing an spost command (i.e. fitstats):
>
> use "http://www.indiana.edu/~jslsoc/stata/spex_data/couart2.dta", clear
> poisson art fem mar kid5 phd ment
> <output omitted>
> fitstat
> unrecognized command: _ms_omit_info
> r(199);
>
> I扉e contacted with Dr. Long, and he says that in his machine it works
> perfectly.
> Any ideas on this problem, and how to solve it?
>
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/