Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
| From | Yuval Arbel <yuval.arbel@gmail.com> |
| To | statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu |
| Subject | Re: st: fixed output format with two decimal digits |
| Date | Fri, 23 Nov 2012 18:52:11 +0200 |
Hi William, thanks for the advice. It works like a charm. On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 4:21 PM, William Buchanan <william@williambuchanan.net> wrote: > If you use -estout- from SSC, there are display options available for each set of values that you include in the table. > > HTH, > Billy > > Sent from my iPhone > > On Nov 23, 2012, at 6:09, Yuval Arbel <yuval.arbel@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Dear statalisters, >> >> I run a probit model and get the following outcome: >> >> Probit regression, reporting marginal effects Number of obs = 282 >> LR chi2(9) = 44.04 >> Prob > chi2 = 0.0000 >> Log likelihood = -170.87868 Pseudo R2 = 0.1142 >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> kinc | dF/dx Std. Err. z P>|z| x-bar [ 95% C.I. ] >> ---------+-------------------------------------------------------------------- >> vetek | .0209189 .0100505 2.08 0.037 14.4468 .00122 .040618 >> hco~l567*| .1472128 .0681511 2.13 0.034 .560284 .013639 .280786 >> assim567*| .1996477 .0632462 3.03 0.002 .634752 .075688 .323608 >> edu456*| .0193856 .0877187 0.22 0.826 .833333 -.15254 .191311 >> republ~2*| -.1033072 .0750537 -1.34 0.180 .205674 -.25041 .043795 >> age567*| .0058098 .0805854 0.07 0.942 .336879 -.152135 .163754 >> child | .0696712 .0352711 1.97 0.048 .765957 .000541 .138801 >> frie~345*| .0588883 .0657612 0.90 0.370 .397163 -.070001 .187778 >> neig~s45*| .0960822 .0664365 1.45 0.147 .329787 -.034131 .226295 >> ---------+-------------------------------------------------------------------- >> obs. P | .4326241 >> pred. P | .4227375 (at x-bar) >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >> Is there any way to define the regression output, so that each >> coefficient and s.e. will be rounded to two decimal digits? for >> example: the coefficient of vetek will be rounded to 0.02 and the s.e. >> to 0.01? I would like to apply the same principle to all the >> coefficients and s.e., so that I get this output when I run the >> -outreg2- command >> >> As always, your assistance will be highly appreciated >> >> >> -- >> Dr. Yuval Arbel >> School of Business >> Carmel Academic Center >> 4 Shaar Palmer Street, >> Haifa 33031, Israel >> e-mail1: yuval.arbel@carmel.ac.il >> e-mail2: yuval.arbel@gmail.com >> * >> * For searches and help try: >> * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search >> * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/ >> * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/ > > * > * For searches and help try: > * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search > * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/ > * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/ -- Dr. Yuval Arbel School of Business Carmel Academic Center 4 Shaar Palmer Street, Haifa 33031, Israel e-mail1: yuval.arbel@carmel.ac.il e-mail2: yuval.arbel@gmail.com * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/ * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/