Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
st: RE: Interpretation of the Bland-Altman method on Stata
From
"Seed, Paul" <[email protected]>
To
"[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject
st: RE: Interpretation of the Bland-Altman method on Stata
Date
Thu, 22 Nov 2012 21:05:09 +0000
Dear Emily,
-baplot- clearly works with logged values; or at least produces numbers rather than error messages.
When I said it was not designed for logged values, I meant that the output is not clear,
and further calculations are needed to make sense of them.
It is clear that you used logs base e, not base 10.
-baplot- treats the first variable as the new method and the second as the reference;
so you might want to reverse the order.
The mean difference is based on
energy_log_r - energy_log_q
= log( energypd_r)- log( energypd_q)
= log( energypd_r/energypd_q)
So exp(mean difference) = energypd_r/energypd_q
Simple arithmetic converts this ratio to a % difference:
exp(-0.420) = 0.657
Because you are using logs this is the ratio of the geometric means.
The value using method r is only 66% of that found using method q.
A 34% reduction.