Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: st: FW: how to do binary mediation with survey data
From
Steve Samuels <[email protected]>
To
[email protected]
Subject
Re: st: FW: how to do binary mediation with survey data
Date
Thu, 15 Nov 2012 09:51:28 -0500
On Nov 15, 2012, at 9:33 AM, Ariel Linden, DrPH wrote:
Craig
I suggest you consider -medeff- or -khb- for categorical outcome variables
(both are user-written programs [findit medeff, findit khb].
I am not sure if either program works with -svy-, however both approaches
allow for pweights (though I am not sure how that will impact the results).
In a paper that Kristian Karlson and I currently writing, we ran large scale
simulations to test the accuracy of several mediation modeling approaches.
Both of these programs (-medeff and -khb-) recover the true mediation
effects with the highest accuracy while binary_mediation provided rather
inaccurate results.
I hope this helps
Ariel
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2012 12:03:46 +0000
From: "Morgan, Craig" <[email protected]>
Subject: st: FW: how to do binary mediation with survey data
Hi
I want to do a mediation analysis using survey data. I've previously used
the binary_mediation' command, but this doesn't allow the prefix 'svy:'.
Can anyone advise on how I can do a mediation analysis with prefix 'svy:'
when the outcome variable is dichotomous?
Thanks
Craig Morgan
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/