Notice: On April 23, 2014, Statalist moved from an email list to a forum, based at statalist.org.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: st: svyset
From
Stas Kolenikov <[email protected]>
To
[email protected]
Subject
Re: st: svyset
Date
Fri, 2 Nov 2012 17:20:52 -0500
> So, if the systematc procedure had worked with replacement, I could simply use:
>
> svyset psu_var [pw=hhweights_var], strata(strata1_var)
This would be arguably the most conservative approximation that would
give the largest standard errors.
> I don't need to create strata2.
Well, you can try and see if your standard errors change my much. They
should go down a little bit, may be by some 5-10%.
> I was wondering if I have to use the fpc. I know that it is neccesary
> to use it with systematic procedure. Now I am confused because the
> first stage is a combined procedure (PPS + systematic) and the second
> stage is a systematic procedure.
Systematic sampling basically cannot be cured. I don't see how adding
fpc to it would be justified.
--
-- Stas Kolenikov, PhD, PStat (SSC) :: http://stas.kolenikov.name
-- Senior Survey Statistician, Abt SRBI :: work email kolenikovs at
srbi dot com
-- Opinions stated in this email are mine only, and do not reflect the
position of my employer
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/help.cgi?search
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/resources/statalist-faq/
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/